[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-2635) Support for OC4J - 10.1.3
by Chris Simons (JIRA)
Support for OC4J - 10.1.3
-------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-2635
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2635
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Platform interoperability
Environment: Solaris, Linux, Windows
Reporter: Chris Simons
Fix For: 2.0.0.GA
To gauge interest in Seam support, whether it be detailed documentation or actual changes to baseline, within the Oracle Container For Java (OC4J) 10.1.3.
10.1.3 is also known as Oracle Application Server 10g Release 3.
Our personal example...
After receiving the go-ahead to use the JBoss AS on our application development contract to a U.S. military organization we were disappointed to find that ongoing software standardization efforts, of which were not communicated to contractors, are starting to take affect. Our client is currently running a distributed Oracle AS 10g Release 2 infrastructure but we're hoping we can convince them to move to Release 3 in the near future. Therefore, 10.1.3 support for Seam, seeing as we have invested at least a few months into the development cycle, might prove to be critical.
Please vote for this issue if you are interested in supporting this feature request.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 6 months
[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-2121) Support for an SMPC per nested conversation
by Jacob Orshalick (JIRA)
Support for an SMPC per nested conversation
-------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-2121
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2121
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Feature Request
Affects Versions: 2.0.0.CR2
Reporter: Jacob Orshalick
Currently an open issue and ongoing discussion with respect to the existing nested conversation implementation is master-details editing. If a Seam-managed Persistence Context (SMPC) is shared between the outer and nested conversation, any changes made in the nested conversation will be flushed by the SMPC in the outer conversation and vice versa if a flush is initiated. Support for initialization of a new SMPC within a nested conversation would allow state changes in the nested conversation to be confined to that conversation, thus resolving this issue. Perhaps something like the following could be supported:
<persistence:managed-persistence-context name="bookingDatabase"
auto-create="true"
per-nested-conversation-"true"
persistence-unit-jndi-name="java:/EntityManagerFactories/bookingData"/>
It would also be nice to be able to use annotations (i.e. something similar to @PerNestedConversation).
For further information on this approach please see the forum posting. Thanks.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 6 months
[jbossseam-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBSEAM-1009) optionally login-require in a more specific page should be able to override a wildcard login-require
by Leo Baschy (JIRA)
optionally login-require in a more specific page should be able to override a wildcard login-require
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-1009
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1009
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Patch
Components: Security
Affects Versions: 1.2.0.GA
Environment: all
Reporter: Leo Baschy
This should be optional to switch on, so no one's existing expectations of security get broken.
The point is about having a generic wildcard <page view-id="*" scheme="http" login-required="true"> to secure the whole site, and then allowing specific pages or specific wildcards to have login-required="false". E.g. for a registration (with preview) section as one cannot be logged in if one isn't registered yet.
Some may suggest instead forcing pages into dedicated secure and not-secure directories, but in reality if there are multiple reasons to force pages into directories different ways (security, hyperlink management, publishability of URLs, etc.), one cannot serve all of them.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
17 years, 6 months