4:07 p.m.
I think "Dynamic VDB" best describes the feature. The VDB is being
built at run time (aka, dynamically) from a meta data stream.
teiid-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org wrote:
> Send teiid-users mailing list submissions to
> teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> teiid-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> teiid-users-owner(a)lists.jboss.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of teiid-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. What should we call this artifact? (Ramesh Reddy)
> 2. Re: What should we call this artifact? (Larry O'Leary)
> 3. Re: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact? (Ken Johnson)
> 4. Re: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact? (Ted Jones)
> 5. Re: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact?
> (Rama Kishore Yelamanchilli)
> 6. Re: What should we call this artifact? (John Doyle)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:05:56 -0500
> From: Ramesh Reddy <rareddy(a)redhat.com>
> Subject: [teiid-users] What should we call this artifact?
> To: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Message-ID: <1251489956.3339.19.camel(a)localhost.localdomain>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Hi,
>
> You all know that starting with 6.2 release we have a new feature called
> "Connector Supplied Metadata", where connectors will be able to import
> metadata dynamically at runtime for data integration purposes.
>
> To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been
> calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are
> building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular
> VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer!
>
> I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are
> "dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name
for this,
> so that we all can refer it by the same name?
>
> Thanks
>
> Ramesh..
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:36:34 +0000
> From: "Larry O'Leary" <loleary(a)redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [teiid-users] What should we call this artifact?
> To: Ramesh Reddy <rareddy(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Message-ID: <1251491795.2925.62.camel@loleary>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 15:05 -0500, Ramesh Reddy wrote:
>
>> To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been
>> calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are
>> building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular
>> VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer!
>>
>> I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are
>> "dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good
name for this,
>> so that we all can refer it by the same name?
>>
>
> How about:
> Model-less VDB.
> Headless VDB
> SVDB (Source VDB)
> PVDB (Physical VDB)
>
> --
> Larry O'Leary <loleary(a)redhat.com>
> Red Hat, Inc.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:26:43 -0400
> From: Ken Johnson <kejohnso(a)redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [teiid-users] [teiid-dev] What should we call this
> artifact?
> To: Ramesh Reddy <rareddy(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Message-ID: <4A9875C3.9080804(a)redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> How about:
>
> skinnyvdb
> minivdb
> tinyvdb
>
> -Ken
>
>
> Ramesh Reddy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> You all know that starting with 6.2 release we have a new feature called
>> "Connector Supplied Metadata", where connectors will be able to import
>> metadata dynamically at runtime for data integration purposes.
>>
>> To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been
>> calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are
>> building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular
>> VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer!
>>
>> I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are
>> "dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good
name for this,
>> so that we all can refer it by the same name?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Ramesh..
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> teiid-dev mailing list
>> teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ken Johnson
> Sr. Product Manager
> JBoss Middleware Business Unit
> Red Hat, Inc
> 978.392.3917
> ken.johnson(a)redhat.com
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:06:10 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Ted Jones <tejones(a)redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [teiid-users] [teiid-dev] What should we call this
> artifact?
> To: Ramesh Reddy <rareddy(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Message-ID:
>
<1492195497.633701251493570758.JavaMail.root(a)zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> How about:
>
> "Def-driven VDB" or "d-vdb"?
>
> Dynamic VDB seems good too.
>
>
> Ted
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ramesh Reddy" <rareddy(a)redhat.com>
> To: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 3:05:56 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact?
>
> Hi,
>
> You all know that starting with 6.2 release we have a new feature called
> "Connector Supplied Metadata", where connectors will be able to import
> metadata dynamically at runtime for data integration purposes.
>
> To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been
> calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are
> building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular
> VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer!
>
> I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are
> "dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name
for this,
> so that we all can refer it by the same name?
>
> Thanks
>
> Ramesh..
>
> _______________________________________________
> teiid-dev mailing list
> teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:02:37 +0000
> From: Rama Kishore Yelamanchilli <rkishore999(a)hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [teiid-users] [teiid-dev] What should we call this
> artifact?
> To: <tejones(a)redhat.com>, <rareddy(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Message-ID: <BAY121-W21007AC98F4EE2BB825A38E5F40(a)phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
>
>
> I don't know whether I can participate in this? If I can, I liked dvdb (dynamic
vdb) and would like to have extension as .dvdb instead of .def which will later be
converted to .vdb file at runtime.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Ram
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:06:10 -0400
>> From: tejones(a)redhat.com
>> To: rareddy(a)redhat.com
>> CC: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org; teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Subject: Re: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact?
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> "Def-driven VDB" or "d-vdb"?
>>
>> Dynamic VDB seems good too.
>>
>>
>> Ted
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ramesh Reddy" <rareddy(a)redhat.com>
>> To: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 3:05:56 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
>> Subject: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> You all know that starting with 6.2 release we have a new feature called
>> "Connector Supplied Metadata", where connectors will be able to import
>> metadata dynamically at runtime for data integration purposes.
>>
>> To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been
>> calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are
>> building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular
>> VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer!
>>
>> I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are
>> "dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good
name for this,
>> so that we all can refer it by the same name?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Ramesh..
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> teiid-dev mailing list
>> teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> teiid-dev mailing list
>> teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Log on to MSN India for a lowdown on what?s hot in the world today
> http://in.msn.com
>