I like dynamic vdb more than any other name tossed out so far. But I'll toss some out
----- "Ramesh Reddy" <rareddy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
You all know that starting with 6.2 release we have a new feature
"Connector Supplied Metadata", where connectors will be able to
metadata dynamically at runtime for data integration purposes.
To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been
calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We
building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a
VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer!
I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out
"dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name for
so that we all can refer it by the same name?
teiid-users mailing list