I think "Dynamic VDB" best describes the feature. The VDB is being built at run time (aka, dynamically) from a meta data stream. teiid-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org wrote: > Send teiid-users mailing list submissions to > teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > teiid-users-request(a)lists.jboss.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > teiid-users-owner(a)lists.jboss.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of teiid-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. What should we call this artifact? (Ramesh Reddy) > 2. Re: What should we call this artifact? (Larry O'Leary) > 3. Re: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact? (Ken Johnson) > 4. Re: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact? (Ted Jones) > 5. Re: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact? > (Rama Kishore Yelamanchilli) > 6. Re: What should we call this artifact? (John Doyle) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:05:56 -0500 > From: Ramesh Reddy <rareddy(a)redhat.com&gt; > Subject: [teiid-users] What should we call this artifact? > To: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Message-ID: <1251489956.3339.19.camel(a)localhost.localdomain&gt; > Content-Type: text/plain > > Hi, > > You all know that starting with 6.2 release we have a new feature called > "Connector Supplied Metadata", where connectors will be able to import > metadata dynamically at runtime for data integration purposes. > > To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been > calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are > building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular > VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer! > > I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are > "dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name for this, > so that we all can refer it by the same name? > > Thanks > > Ramesh.. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:36:34 +0000 > From: "Larry O'Leary" <loleary(a)redhat.com&gt; > Subject: Re: [teiid-users] What should we call this artifact? > To: Ramesh Reddy <rareddy(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Message-ID: <1251491795.2925.62.camel@loleary> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 15:05 -0500, Ramesh Reddy wrote: > >> To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been >> calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are >> building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular >> VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer! >> >> I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are >> "dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name for this, >> so that we all can refer it by the same name? >> > > How about: > Model-less VDB. > Headless VDB > SVDB (Source VDB) > PVDB (Physical VDB) > > -- > Larry O'Leary <loleary(a)redhat.com&gt; > Red Hat, Inc. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:26:43 -0400 > From: Ken Johnson <kejohnso(a)redhat.com&gt; > Subject: Re: [teiid-users] [teiid-dev] What should we call this > artifact? > To: Ramesh Reddy <rareddy(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Message-ID: <4A9875C3.9080804(a)redhat.com&gt; > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > How about: > > skinnyvdb > minivdb > tinyvdb > > -Ken > > > Ramesh Reddy wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> You all know that starting with 6.2 release we have a new feature called >> "Connector Supplied Metadata", where connectors will be able to import >> metadata dynamically at runtime for data integration purposes. >> >> To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been >> calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are >> building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular >> VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer! >> >> I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are >> "dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name for this, >> so that we all can refer it by the same name? >> >> Thanks >> >> Ramesh.. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> teiid-dev mailing list >> teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev >> >> > > > -- > Ken Johnson > Sr. Product Manager > JBoss Middleware Business Unit > Red Hat, Inc > 978.392.3917 > ken.johnson(a)redhat.com > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:06:10 -0400 (EDT) > From: Ted Jones <tejones(a)redhat.com&gt; > Subject: Re: [teiid-users] [teiid-dev] What should we call this > artifact? > To: Ramesh Reddy <rareddy(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Message-ID: > <1492195497.633701251493570758.JavaMail.root(a)zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com&gt; > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > How about: > > "Def-driven VDB" or "d-vdb"? > > Dynamic VDB seems good too. > > > Ted > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ramesh Reddy" <rareddy(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 3:05:56 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact? > > Hi, > > You all know that starting with 6.2 release we have a new feature called > "Connector Supplied Metadata", where connectors will be able to import > metadata dynamically at runtime for data integration purposes. > > To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been > calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are > building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular > VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer! > > I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are > "dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name for this, > so that we all can refer it by the same name? > > Thanks > > Ramesh.. > > _______________________________________________ > teiid-dev mailing list > teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:02:37 +0000 > From: Rama Kishore Yelamanchilli <rkishore999(a)hotmail.com&gt; > Subject: Re: [teiid-users] [teiid-dev] What should we call this > artifact? > To: <tejones(a)redhat.com&gt;, <rareddy(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Message-ID: <BAY121-W21007AC98F4EE2BB825A38E5F40(a)phx.gbl&gt; > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > > > I don't know whether I can participate in this? If I can, I liked dvdb (dynamic vdb) and would like to have extension as .dvdb instead of .def which will later be converted to .vdb file at runtime. > > > > Regards > > > > Ram > > > > >> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:06:10 -0400 >> From: tejones(a)redhat.com >> To: rareddy(a)redhat.com >> CC: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org; teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> Subject: Re: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact? >> >> How about: >> >> "Def-driven VDB" or "d-vdb"? >> >> Dynamic VDB seems good too. >> >> >> Ted >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Ramesh Reddy" <rareddy(a)redhat.com&gt; >> To: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 3:05:56 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central >> Subject: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact? >> >> Hi, >> >> You all know that starting with 6.2 release we have a new feature called >> "Connector Supplied Metadata", where connectors will be able to import >> metadata dynamically at runtime for data integration purposes. >> >> To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been >> calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are >> building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular >> VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer! >> >> I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are >> "dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name for this, >> so that we all can refer it by the same name? >> >> Thanks >> >> Ramesh.. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> teiid-dev mailing list >> teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> teiid-dev mailing list >> teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > Log on to MSN India for a lowdown on what?s hot in the world today > http://in.msn.com >