Re: [aerogear-dev] [GSoC 2016] AeroGear WebPush and UnifiedPush Server integration

Hi Idel, these ideas sound extremely awesome, and I agree they are a logic next steps on the ground work of your project last year. The WebPush Server needs updates too, to be compliant to latest version of the spec, right? On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy < idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hello community! > > I'm happy to work with you during the last year! Thank you for the great > project! I use it for the pleasured Open Source development when I have > free time and I use UPS with my own projects at work. > > I'm highly motivated to continue my work on WebPush protocol and move it > to UPS! > > Expected results for GSoC 2016 project: > > - Add WebPush support for Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Safari > browsers into UPS. > - Integrate AeroGear WebPush server with UnifiedPush Server. > - Good test coverage for the new code. > - Documentation for all new developments and changes. > - Demo application for showing the work of WebPush protocol in action > with UPS! > > I think we could have two demos :)

> - > > > Possible additional tasks which could be done: > > - Java client for AppServer (similar as a current client for User > Agents). > - Rewrite java clients with native Java 9 HTTP/2 API. > > what clients do you mean ?

> - > - Port webpush-codec directly to Netty. It will simplify WebPush > Server code base and attract other developers to improve the core of the > protocol. > > Glad to see your feedback! > > Best regards, > Idel Pivnitskiy > -- > Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy> > GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy> > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf