Re: [aerogear-dev] UnifiedPush overview image

On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Burr Sutter <bsutter(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: I would like to see a much more explicit identification of PhoneGap/Cordova wrapped around that aerogear.js Our largest userbase should be the Phonegap/Cordova crowd. Ummm, I have to disagree there. The entire idea of SimplePush is based around bringing push notifications to web apps. If a Cordova dev wants push notifications they will more likely use something like https://github.com/phonegap-build/PushPlugin or some other push plugin along with the native (APNS, GCM) services since I imagine they want the push notification to also happen when the app isn't open. Our SimplePushClient won't give them that.

On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:57 PM, Kris Borchers wrote: On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: On 12/08/2013 20:39, Kris Borchers wrote: I also like it. One request/question. Would it be possible and not confusing to split the JS image to also show desktop? I'm thinking split the image on a diagonal from bottom left to top right so that upper left side of image is the top portion of a mobile device and bottom right portion of image is the bottom of a monitor and partial keyboard? I just think it would be cool to show it would work on both somehow in one image. Yep, that's a good idea. Updated version: https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push... Nice! Much better than my idea. I like it! Hylke On Aug 12, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: I personally like it On Monday, August 12, 2013, Hylke Bons wrote: > > https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push... > How's that? > > Hylke > > On 12/08/2013 14:12, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > Luke's UI is already using the latest wording, so I am not sure besides > the overview graphic if there are much changes really needed > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> Sure. Sounds like an improvement to me. I guess we need this updated in >> the wireframes and implementation as well then? >> >> Hylke >> >> >> On 08/08/2013 13:43, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> >>> Hi Hylke, >>> >>> can we get an update on this image: >>> >>> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/aerogear_unif... >>> >>> * the "Mobile Variant Instances" are now named "Installations" >>> * there is no device representing a SimplePush client >>> >>> I guess I should file a JIRA :-) >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev