Hi Hylke, can we get an update on this image: http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/aerogear_unif... * the "Mobile Variant Instances" are now named "Installations" * there is no device representing a SimplePush client I guess I should file a JIRA :-) -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Luke's UI is already using the latest wording, so I am not sure besides the overview graphic if there are much changes really needed On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com <mailto:hbons@redhat.com>> wrote: Sure. Sounds like an improvement to me. I guess we need this updated in the wireframes and implementation as well then? Hylke On 08/08/2013 13:43, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi Hylke, can we get an update on this image: http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/aerogear_unif... * the "Mobile Variant Instances" are now named "Installations" * there is no device representing a SimplePush client I guess I should file a JIRA :-) -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

I personally like it On Monday, August 12, 2013, Hylke Bons wrote: https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push... How's that? Hylke On 12/08/2013 14:12, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Luke's UI is already using the latest wording, so I am not sure besides the overview graphic if there are much changes really needed > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Sure. Sounds like an improvement to me. I guess we need this updated in the wireframes and implementation as well then? > > Hylke > > > On 08/08/2013 13:43, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > Hi Hylke, > > can we get an update on this image: > http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/aerogear_unif... > > * the "Mobile Variant Instances" are now named "Installations" > * there is no device representing a SimplePush client > > I guess I should file a JIRA :-) > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Hi, We have two "2"s and no "4"s on that nice looking image. Is that intentional? (considering the numbers show the action flow, having "4" makes more sense to me). Kind regards, --- Yavuz Selim Yilmaz SUNY at Buffalo Computer Science and Engineering PhD Candidate On Aug 12, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com <mailto:kris@redhat.com>> wrote: > I also like it. One request/question. Would it be possible and not > confusing to split the JS image to also show desktop? I'm thinking > split the image on a diagonal from bottom left to top right so that > upper left side of image is the top portion of a mobile device and > bottom right portion of image is the bottom of a monitor and partial > keyboard? I just think it would be cool to show it would work on both > somehow in one image. > > On Aug 12, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org > <mailto:matzew@apache.org>> wrote: > >> I personally like it >> >> On Monday, August 12, 2013, Hylke Bons wrote: >> >> https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push... >> How's that? >> >> Hylke >> >> On 12/08/2013 14:12, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>> Luke's UI is already using the latest wording, so I am not sure >>> besides the overview graphic if there are much changes really >>> needed >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com >>> <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', &#39;hbons(a)redhat.com&#39;);&gt;&gt; wrote: >>> >>> Sure. Sounds like an improvement to me. I guess we need >>> this updated in the wireframes and implementation as well then? >>> >>> Hylke >>> >>> >>> On 08/08/2013 13:43, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>> >>> Hi Hylke, >>> >>> can we get an update on this image: >>> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/aerogear_unif... >>> >>> * the "Mobile Variant Instances" are now named >>> "Installations" >>> * there is no device representing a SimplePush client >>> >>> I guess I should file a JIRA :-) >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

I also like it. One request/question. Would it be possible and not confusing to split the JS image to also show desktop? I'm thinking split the image on a diagonal from bottom left to top right so that upper left side of image is the top portion of a mobile device and bottom right portion of image is the bottom of a monitor and partial keyboard? I just think it would be cool to show it would work on both somehow in one image.

On Aug 12, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org <mailto:matzew@apache.org>> wrote: > I personally like it > > On Monday, August 12, 2013, Hylke Bons wrote: > > https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push... > How's that? > > Hylke > > On 12/08/2013 14:12, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> Luke's UI is already using the latest wording, so I am not sure >> besides the overview graphic if there are much changes really needed >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com >> <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', &#39;hbons(a)redhat.com&#39;);&gt;&gt; wrote: >> >> Sure. Sounds like an improvement to me. I guess we need this >> updated in the wireframes and implementation as well then? >> >> Hylke >> >> >> On 08/08/2013 13:43, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> >> Hi Hylke, >> >> can we get an update on this image: >> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/aerogear_unif... >> >> * the "Mobile Variant Instances" are now named >> "Installations" >> * there is no device representing a SimplePush client >> >> I guess I should file a JIRA :-) >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On 12/08/2013 20:39, Kris Borchers wrote: > I also like it. One request/question. Would it be possible and not confusing to split the JS image to also show desktop? I'm thinking split the image on a diagonal from bottom left to top right so that upper left side of image is the top portion of a mobile device and bottom right portion of image is the bottom of a monitor and partial keyboard? I just think it would be cool to show it would work on both somehow in one image. > Yep, that's a good idea. Updated version: https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push...

Hylke > On Aug 12, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > >> I personally like it >> >> On Monday, August 12, 2013, Hylke Bons wrote: >> https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push... >> How's that? >> >> Hylke >> >> On 12/08/2013 14:12, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>> Luke's UI is already using the latest wording, so I am not sure besides the overview graphic if there are much changes really needed >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> Sure. Sounds like an improvement to me. I guess we need this updated in the wireframes and implementation as well then? >>> >>> Hylke >>> >>> >>> On 08/08/2013 13:43, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>> Hi Hylke, >>> >>> can we get an update on this image: >>> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/aerogear_unif... >>> >>> * the "Mobile Variant Instances" are now named "Installations" >>> * there is no device representing a SimplePush client >>> >>> I guess I should file a JIRA :-) >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >

I would like to see a much more explicit identification of PhoneGap/Cordova wrapped around that aerogear.js Our largest userbase should be the Phonegap/Cordova crowd.

On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:57 PM, Kris Borchers wrote: > > On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> On 12/08/2013 20:39, Kris Borchers wrote: >>> I also like it. One request/question. Would it be possible and not confusing to split the JS image to also show desktop? I'm thinking split the image on a diagonal from bottom left to top right so that upper left side of image is the top portion of a mobile device and bottom right portion of image is the bottom of a monitor and partial keyboard? I just think it would be cool to show it would work on both somehow in one image. >>> >> >> Yep, that's a good idea. Updated version: >> https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push... > > Nice! Much better than my idea. I like it! >> >> Hylke >> >> >> >>> On Aug 12, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> I personally like it >>>> >>>> On Monday, August 12, 2013, Hylke Bons wrote: >>>> https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push... >>>> How's that? >>>> >>>> Hylke >>>> >>>> On 12/08/2013 14:12, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>>>> Luke's UI is already using the latest wording, so I am not sure besides the overview graphic if there are much changes really needed >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> Sure. Sounds like an improvement to me. I guess we need this updated in the wireframes and implementation as well then? >>>>> >>>>> Hylke >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 08/08/2013 13:43, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>>>> Hi Hylke, >>>>> >>>>> can we get an update on this image: >>>>> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/aerogear_unif... >>>>> >>>>> * the "Mobile Variant Instances" are now named "Installations" >>>>> * there is no device representing a SimplePush client >>>>> >>>>> I guess I should file a JIRA :-) >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>> >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>> >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Burr Sutter <bsutter(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: I would like to see a much more explicit identification of PhoneGap/Cordova wrapped around that aerogear.js Our largest userbase should be the Phonegap/Cordova crowd. Ummm, I have to disagree there. The entire idea of SimplePush is based around bringing push notifications to web apps. If a Cordova dev wants push notifications they will more likely use something like https://github.com/phonegap-build/PushPlugin or some other push plugin along with the native (APNS, GCM) services since I imagine they want the push notification to also happen when the app isn't open. Our SimplePushClient won't give them that.

On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:57 PM, Kris Borchers wrote: On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: On 12/08/2013 20:39, Kris Borchers wrote: I also like it. One request/question. Would it be possible and not confusing to split the JS image to also show desktop? I'm thinking split the image on a diagonal from bottom left to top right so that upper left side of image is the top portion of a mobile device and bottom right portion of image is the bottom of a monitor and partial keyboard? I just think it would be cool to show it would work on both somehow in one image. Yep, that's a good idea. Updated version: https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push... Nice! Much better than my idea. I like it! Hylke On Aug 12, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: I personally like it On Monday, August 12, 2013, Hylke Bons wrote: > > https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push... > How's that? > > Hylke > > On 12/08/2013 14:12, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > Luke's UI is already using the latest wording, so I am not sure besides > the overview graphic if there are much changes really needed > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> Sure. Sounds like an improvement to me. I guess we need this updated in >> the wireframes and implementation as well then? >> >> Hylke >> >> >> On 08/08/2013 13:43, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> >>> Hi Hylke, >>> >>> can we get an update on this image: >>> >>> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/aerogear_unif... >>> >>> * the "Mobile Variant Instances" are now named "Installations" >>> * there is no device representing a SimplePush client >>> >>> I guess I should file a JIRA :-) >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Aug 13, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Kris Borchers wrote: On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Burr Sutter <bsutter(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: I would like to see a much more explicit identification of PhoneGap/Cordova wrapped around that aerogear.js Our largest userbase should be the Phonegap/Cordova crowd. Ummm, I have to disagree there. The entire idea of SimplePush is based around bringing push notifications to web apps. If a Cordova dev wants push notifications they will more likely use something like https://github.com/phonegap-build/PushPlugin or some other push plugin along with the native (APNS, GCM) services since I imagine they want the push notification to also happen when the app isn't open. Our SimplePushClient won't give them that. I did not realize this graphic was focused on SimplePush and the FireFox OS. If so, I retract my point. I remain hopeful that we will offer a good solution for the HTML5-focused Phonegap/Cordova APNS/GCM developers of the world.

On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:57 PM, Kris Borchers wrote: On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: On 12/08/2013 20:39, Kris Borchers wrote: I also like it. One request/question. Would it be possible and not confusing to split the JS image to also show desktop? I'm thinking split the image on a diagonal from bottom left to top right so that upper left side of image is the top portion of a mobile device and bottom right portion of image is the bottom of a monitor and partial keyboard? I just think it would be cool to show it would work on both somehow in one image. Yep, that's a good idea. Updated version: https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push... Nice! Much better than my idea. I like it! Hylke On Aug 12, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: I personally like it On Monday, August 12, 2013, Hylke Bons wrote: > > https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push... > How's that? > > Hylke > > On 12/08/2013 14:12, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > Luke's UI is already using the latest wording, so I am not sure besides > the overview graphic if there are much changes really needed > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> Sure. Sounds like an improvement to me. I guess we need this updated in >> the wireframes and implementation as well then? >> >> Hylke >> >> >> On 08/08/2013 13:43, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> >>> Hi Hylke, >>> >>> can we get an update on this image: >>> >>> http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/aerogear_unif... >>> >>> * the "Mobile Variant Instances" are now named "Installations" >>> * there is no device representing a SimplePush client >>> >>> I guess I should file a JIRA :-) >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev