[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EMBJOPR-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.pl... ] Ian Springer commented on EMBJOPR-108: -------------------------------------- I based the Resource types I exposed off of the ConnectionFactoryTypes enum from org.jboss.deployers.spi.management.KnownComponentTypes: /** * Enums for generic ConnectionFactory types */ public enum ConnectionFactoryTypes { XA("ConnectionFactory", "XA"), NoTx("ConnectionFactory", "NoTx"); private final String type; private final String subtype; private ConnectionFactoryTypes(String type, String subtype) { this.type = type; this.subtype = subtype; } public String type() { return type; } public String subtype() { return subtype; } public ComponentType getType() { return new ComponentType(type, subtype); } }; If there is also a LocalTX type, then this enum should probably be updated. Scott, can you comment? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EMBJOPR-108?page=com.atlassian.jira.pl... ] Scott M Stark commented on EMBJOPR-108: --------------------------------------- I did not catch the ConnectionFactoryTypes vs DataSourceTypes. There is a new jira issue to review the enums: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6646 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira