Honestly Scott, I am thoroughly confused now as to what you are wanting and
what you are reporting.
Your last code fragment[1] is close. As I said earlier, building a
SessionFactory typically involves individual service registries being used
for each SF. You have to go out of your way for that to not be the case.
I am pretty sure WF does not do this "going out of its way". So not sure
why the test does. To me either:
1. write a unit test for StandardServiceRegistry(/Builder)
2. write a functional test for how building a SessionFactory handles
StandardServiceRegistry.
Instead you kind of do both and therefor do neither.
I created a fork of your gist that shows a better test using (2), which I
think is more what you are wondering about. It is "better" imo because I
*think* it better represents what you do in WF/Jipijapa -
https://gist.github.com/sebersole/d93a28b1dcf16f6f7eb823b7341a9097
[1]
https://gist.github.com/scottmarlow/63241549820243923aab16e664c3c6c3
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:05 AM Scott Marlow <smarlow(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I verified that SessionFactoryServiceContributor doesn't help WF
either,
as we see the same problem.
I did hack together a unit test under ORM (using the WF integration
testing) that shows that we don't see the same problem when the
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/tree/master/hibernate-jipijapa
integration classes are used.
It seems likely that something is wrong with the
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/tree/master/jpa/hibernate5_3/src/main/...
classes, that causes the problem that I am seeing.
Scott