On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 12:34, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
Hey Sanne,
> ALL commits need to start with the JIRA code which relates to the change.
Perhaps you're doing this already, so just in case: for Debezium we have a simple
check of that as a GH action, failing PR builds if they contain commits whose message does
not begin with "DBZ-":
https://github.com/debezium/debezium/blob/master/.github/workflows/sanity...
thanks! I was just reading about such options right now, and your
example is really handy!
Do you think it would be possible to evolve such a rule to check that
it's not a closed JIRA ? (I'm sure it is, but I mean to ask if it's
simple enough to be worth exploring)
>
> --Gunnar
>
>
>
> Am Di., 29. Sept. 2020 um 13:15 Uhr schrieb Sanne Grinovero
<sanne(a)hibernate.org>:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> looks like it's a good time for me to remind how we need commits
>> managed, and their relation to JIRA tickets.
>>
>> When reviewing pull requests, and before merging them, please pay
>> attention to these simple rules as it's important for long term
>> maintenance.
>> We need to be able to query JIRA to figure out which branches and
>> versions contain a specific patch; it's also useful for people to know
>> if they might be affected by a specific bug.
>>
>> # Commit format
>> ALL commits need to start with the JIRA code which relates to the change.
>>
>> This implies that any little improvement needs a JIRA ticket created
>> before being integrated; this is sometimes a little inconvenient, but
>> please stick to it the same.
>>
>> The exception to this rule is the release process itself; it's ok for
>> scripts to push placeholder commits to help identify just-before and
>> just-after tags.
>>
>> # Closed JIRA tickets
>> One should never have a new commit which is recycling a JIRA ticket
>> which is closed already.
>>
>> A closed ticket for us means "sealed and archived".
>>
>> This means that if you discover a better way to fix an issue which is
>> already closed, you will need to open a new JIRA.
>> Even if technically the old issue had not been fixed properly, we
>> don't re-open it as it represents a specific changeset which was
>> already included in a published release: a published release either
>> contains a changeset (a patch) or it doesn't - we can't manage
>> situations well such as "it had half a fix".
>>
>> # Keep unrelated commits separated
>> For as much as possible, when fixing an issue try to focus on the
>> individual issue exclusively.
>>
>> If you notice an opportunity for refactoring related code, it's ok to
>> include it. But if you notice such opportunities, typos, or have a
>> general urge to rewrite code which isn't necessarily useful to touch
>> during the main patch you're working on - then please make this a
>> separate JIRA and a separate set of commits.
>>
>> --
>>
>> That said, we're very reasonable. Including two kinda related
>> changesets in a same PR is ok, especially if one depends on the other.
>> Including a single typo fix is ok. Sending a "follow-up" PR for a fix
>> which was just merged is fine to reuse the same JIRA - as long as it
>> wasn't released yet (and closed).
>>
>> Also, opening a JIRA doesn't have to take much of your time. We don't
>> require many fields to be filled, and for simple issues it's totally
>> ok to have a short description. You can also learn its shortcuts, or
>> use scripts / command line tools to interact with it, integrate it
>> with your IDE.
>>
>> I'll update the CONTRIBUTING.md as I see we could clarify some of
>> these points there.
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> Sanne
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list -- hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to hibernate-dev-leave(a)lists.jboss.org
>> %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s