Reference
https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-7020 and
https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-7090...
Essentially, having 2 sessions share a JDBC connection is currently
broken. Adam, Lukasz and I discussed this on the mailing list a few
months ago and Shawn has been helping me investigating the last few
days. The solution end solution is to have the 2 sessions share both
the TransactionCoordinator and LogicalConnection, but use separate
JdbcCoordinators.
We could get away with them sharing a JdbcCoordinator as well, but that
opens up (slight) potential concurrency issues if the 2 sessions are
used concurrently. The concurrency issues here are not on the same
level as those if using a session concurrently. Mainly JdbcCoordinator
manages the "current JDBC batch" if the session is using JDBC statement
batching. Concurrent access could mean batch circumvention (aka, 1
statement executed in the batch instead of the batch size) if both
sessions are performing writes concurrently.
All the above is a bit specific, but the ultimate question/decision here
is that in order to not reuse JdbcCoordinators requires *major* SPI
changes. Basically we need to invert the relationship between
JdbcCoordinator and TransactionCoordinator. Currently Session holds a
TransactionCoordinator and that TransactionCoordinator is responsible
for managing the JdbcCoordinator. The "proper" change would require
that instead Session hold a JdbcCoordinator which is responsible for
managing a TransactionCoordinator.
A consideration here is that these are SPIs and should not really be
changing between point releases. But another thing to consider is that
these particular SPIs were added in 4.0, so they are relatively new, and
that, in this particular case at least, they are just plain wrong.
What do y'all think between these 2 options?
--
steve(a)hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org