The 4.x branches contain the old documentation, the one that was written
with Hibernate 3 in mind.
The new documentation work was started in 5.0 but we only got it done in
5.1, so 5.0 doesn't contain all the additions we made to the new
documentation.
I can backport it for sure, but I don't know if it won't break something
during the release phase.
For this purpose, I'm going to split this task in two:
1. Copy the whole asciidoc User Guide that we wrote from scratch. This step
will contain a lot of modifications so it will be difficult to review it in
GitHub probably. But it can be reviewing manually.
2. Modify the release procedure to use the new User Guide. This step can be
reviewed by you and Steve so we make sure we don't break anything.
Vlad
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Gail Badner <gbadner(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I noticed there is some information in 4.2 docs that are not in 5.0.
I'm
not sure what happened there.
Is there info in the 5.1 docs that does not apply to 5.0? If so, is there
a way to easily exclude it?
I don't know what all is involved in backporting the docs. If it can be
done safely and excluding 5.1-specific info, then please go ahead.
Thanks!
Gail
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:17 AM, Vlad Mihalcea <mihalcea.vlad(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> I made the change for 4.2.
>
> For 5.0, we should switch to the current 5.1 documentation because the
> 5.0 User Guide lacks a lot of information.
> It requires adding the asciidoc documentation, Gradle configs, and also
> change the release procedure to use asciidoc instead of docbook.
>
> Should we add a new task for this?
>
> Vlad
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Gail Badner <gbadner(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Vlad,
>>
>> Yes, please update the doc for 5.0 and 4.2.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Gail
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Vlad Mihalcea <mihalcea.vlad(a)gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gail,
>>>
>>> For the 5.0 branch, I could update the doc for this issue. A new
>>> release will publish the updated doc, right?
>>> Should the documentation be updated for the 4.x branches too?
>>>
>>> Vlad
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It looks like it changed during 3.6 -> 4.0, reverting back to
>>>> ON_CLOSE. I agree it should changed to AFTER_TRANSACTION, however I
>>>> would only change it on master.
>>>>
>>>> For the other branches, if anything, just update the doc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:40 AM Vlad Mihalcea
<mihalcea.vlad(a)gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think this PR is valid:
>>>>>
>>>>>
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/997
>>>>>
>>>>> I checked it out and, when using JDBC, we use the ON_CLOSE
connection
>>>>> release mode.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shouldn't we use the AFTER_TRANSACTION release mode as we state
in
>>>>> the docs?
>>>>>
>>>>> Vlad
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>>> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>