On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 14:19, Mark Rotteveel <mark(a)lawinegevaar.nl> wrote:
On 16-6-2019 16:28, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> After a significant hiatus, I have restarted my work on adding improved
> support for Firebird 2.5 and 3.0 (and more importantly struggling
> through some test failures).
>
> I am wondering what I should target for my changes: the current master
> branch or the upstream/wip/6.0 branch. What would be the preferred or
> 'better' option?
Hi Mark,
sorry for the late reply, I think we'll need Steve to give you a
definitive answer.
Just wondering, would your patches be significantly different?
As far as I know branch wip/6.0 is a bit in flux ATM, so it might be
safer to just target master.
Or send them to both if that's easy for you?
On a related note, I have touched a lot of tests to either skip them
or
make some changes to make them pass. What is the best approach: commit
together with the dialect changes, or offer the dialect change in a
separate pull request from all those test changes?
Either works for us. Maybe it's easier for you to first send a PR with
all testsuite improvements?
Thanks,
Sanne
Mark
--
Mark Rotteveel
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev