Sorry I replied too fast, I see the usecase.
Do you think proper logging in our part (of the analyzer work) could solve the issue
without people having to use AnalyzerUtils?
For example I'm not a big fan of the fact that AnalyzerUtils plays at the string level
whereas HSearch plays at the object property level.
On 12 mai 2011, at 16:54, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
In which case do you recommend people to write something like that?
Is that related to any use of Hibernate Search?
Also it seems not all methods as they are make sense, for example display pushing to log
is not likely going to be something users want in this form necessarily.
On 11 mai 2011, at 17:45, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> We're using AnalyzerUtils in some of the tests in Hibernate Search,
> but I'm finding myself recommending people to "write something like
> that" quite often lately, it seems that otherwise people have an hard
> time to figure if their analyzer definitions make any sense.
>
> What do you think in moving this class into the main jar, polish the
> javadoc a bit and add a note on how to check your analyzer in the
> docs?
>
> Sanne
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev