On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:43 AM Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
On 10 December 2015 at 15:24, Steve Ebersole
<steve(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> BTW, there is already a hibernate-users mailing list hosted on the JBoss
> Mailman instance. Back when we moved to JBoss Mailman they used to set
up a
> number of lists by default. We just chose to not really use this one in
> particular. We could use this one for purpose discussed here.
Yes, that would be nice. I'm registered on that list, and there have
been questions already although they are extremely rare - I recall
something like 3 a year? - probably because I don't think its
existance was ever advertised.
Not sure. Mailman is not great at showing "list statistics". Actually it
kind of sucks as an archive (not searchable, segmented, etc).
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hibernate-users/
BTW, I looked into creating a Hibernate SO Team. Are we thinking
one
team?
> Or one per project (ORM, OGM, etc)?
Depends on how it works? I do monitor various tags, including
"hibernate", "hibernate-search", "hibernate-ogm" and
sometimes do a
cross-check query like "hibernate" + "lucene", although others on
our
team often arrive first to answer.
If the intent of the feature is to distribute the load among people to
answer and monitor such tags, then I guess you're not interested in
being notified for the Lucene related ones?
From what I understand here:
-
http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/307513/the-power-of-teams-a-propo...
It looks like it's more about showing off our affiliation, and to
create a space were people can ask questions "about the team".
So I'd say a single team unless I misunderstood things.
That would be my vote as well: one team