I never said 'no' I don't think :)
On Mon 25 Feb 2013 12:17:38 PM CST, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> 1) JPA 2.1 is part of EE 7 which requires SE 7
But couldn't JPA 2.1 be used in 1.6 SE environments? I guess there'd
be users doing this. Also if 1.6 is reaching its EOL there are lots of
people still using it. In BV the situation is similar, it is part of
the EE 7 API, but the BV spec (and thus HV) requires only 1.6.
>And see the discussion that took place on this list over a year ago
about O/RM and the Java 6 javac bug
I don't know the details, but could this maybe circumvented by
compiling with javac 1.7, but using 1.6 as target level for the
generated class files?
All in all I think requiring only 1.6 is very beneficial for the
adoption of an API.
--Gunnar
2013/2/25 Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org
<mailto:steve@hibernate.org>>
Was not really a conscious decision, but keep in mind that:
1) JPA 2.1 is part of EE 7 which requires SE 7
2) Oracle Java SE 6 is past any support.
And see the discussion that took place on this list over a year ago
about O/RM and the Java 6 javac bug
On 02/25/2013 04:07 AM, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when trying to use
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.hibernate.javax.persistence</groupId>
> <artifactId>hibernate-jpa-2.1-api</artifactId>
> <version>1.0.0.Draft-10</version>
> </dependency>
>
> in Hibernate Validator I get an UnsupportedClassVersionError.
> Seems the API is compiled with JDK 7, which causes problems in
the HV build.
> Is the use of Java 7 intentional for the JPA API? I don't think
it is required, right?
>
> --Hardy
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev