Months ago Chris volunteered to do the release. I asked him to wait so I
could get HHH-12436 and HHH-11209 fixed.
I'm finally able to address those issues. I think I'll have HHH-12436 ready
to review by early next week. I've already done some some work on on the
last bit mentioned in the PR for HHH-11209, so if nothing else gets in the
way, I should have both fixed next week.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 7:28 AM, Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 15:18, Guillaume Smet
<guillaume.smet(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:05 PM Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
>>
>> It's never realistic to say "it's THE last ..." so I guess I
agree we
>> can show a bit of flexibility - but people should not get used to it,
>> we can not re-establish a plan of regular releases from 5.2.
>
>
> Sure, that's not what I suggest. Just that we shouldn't put too much
pressure on "it's THE LAST release, we need to get everything in order" or
we won't release anything at all.
+1
> So it's more about saying: if we find a big issue or if we introduce a
big regression, we can fix this one and release again.
>
> FWIW, 5.2.18 was planned for June 18th and already contains *62*
resolved issues.
>
> But yes, the idea is no more 5.2 release after this one if we can avoid
it. E.g. no active backport of 5.3 bugfixes.
>
>>
>> We have to severely limit the time we can dedicate to it. Also please
>> make sure people are motivated to update to 5.3, they better have
>> extremely good reasons to not upgrade, and I would like to know more
>> about those reasons. Could you take some notes when you hear such war
>> stories?
>
>
> So, the last one I heard is a user needing to support JPA 2.1
containers. I think it's a good one.
I'm not convinced it's a good one :) but not going to argue, thanks
for sharing it.
>>
>> Of course we can be more flexible with needs of contributors. If
>> someone needs a backport and is volunteering to do 90% of the work
>> then we can help, but we can't spend significant more time than
>> approve changes and trigger the release jobs. No blogs.
>
>
> I think we need to push an announcement but it can be really simple with
just a link to the fixed issues. There's really not much more to say about
it anyway.
Announce it, but no ad-hoc blogs please. We can mention the release in
the next weekly update or something like that.
>
> --
> Guillaume
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev