Hi,
yes creating issues on JIRA is what we normally do, feel free to create them!
They don't have to be sub-stasks; we use subtasks when there are
several "blocker" steps which need to be accomplished to get a feature
and it's so large that it needs to be split.
In this case I'd make a single JIRA for the new feature - which gets
resolved when we'll merge it in its most essential form - and further
improvement ideas can be created now or as needed as independent
improvements.
Thanks!
Sanne
On 9 August 2015 at 06:56, Flemming Harms <flemming.harms(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2015-08-05 23:38 GMT+02:00 Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org>:
>
> Hi Flemming,
> welcome on this list!
>
> I waited a bit to reply myself, as you already know I like the
> proposal. Unfortunately many others are on holidays, so other feedback
> might be slow.
>
> Still I wouldn't let that slow you down and start the works for
> merging it; I already anticipated over chat that this would come and
> we all agree that the concept is useful!
> I don't think others looked at the details yet, but if it comes to
> concerns at that level, we can address smaller issues incrementally.
> (I also didn't look at micro-details, as it's easier to comment on
> those on a pull request).
>
> I had the same question as Martin regarding clustering: with the
> current implementation you expect something like the master/slave
> configuration, or Infinispan to be used as storage, correct?
> I also think it would be interesting to explore the approach further
> to also - optionally - serve as a replacement for these, but that's
> another feature which is easier to experiment with after the core
> concept is merged.
>
> Yes that's correct. To start with it was written very specific to the use
> of Infinispan as directory.
And I agree on we should explore other cluster configuration and I have some
ideas how we can implement it.
>
> .
>
>
> In short, I would simply merge your backend as a new module in
> Hibernate Search! Fork our repository, and send a pull request.
>
> # Code layout / Modules
>
> In terms of code structure, you might have noticed that the module
> 'hibernate-search-engine' (/engine in the source code) does not depend
> on JPA nor Hibernate ORM; the reason is that other projects reuse the
> core indexing strategy and the backends. Since it would be nice to
> allow them to optionally use your backend, still not mandate a
> dependency on ORM for those who don't, I think this should be a new
> Maven module.
>
> We already have
> /backends/jgroups
> /backends/jms
>
> So we could add (name to be refined?) :
> /backends/relationaldb
sure, no problem :)
>
>
> Also, your integration tests probably should be moved together with
> our other integration tests. They are currently running WildFly
> 10.0.0.Alpha6, but that shouldn't be a problem.
>
> # Code Style
>
> We use tabs ;-)
> And also have various other "exotic" conventions regarding white-space
> usage, right header files, etc..
> We use CheckStyle to keep it tidy, it will give you lots of errors and
> when there are many it's not very helpful; I would suggest to take the
> formatting templates attached at the following link and use your IDE's
> formatting capabilities, resort to checkstyle just for the final
> validation:
> -
http://hibernate.org/search/contribute/
>
> # JDK
>
> It looks like your extension requires Java 8; if you could convert it
> to Java 7 that would be nice.
Don't think it will be an issue. As far I remember we don't use any Java8
specific functionality
>
>
> # Rebasing to latest
>
> I'm afraid we're now aiming at Hibernate ORM 5, so some details might
> need to be updated; probably just in the configuration area. We're
> also in the process of upgrading to Apache Lucene 5, but that
> shouldn't affect you at all.
>
> # Some improvement ideas
>
> While we should support the case in which Hibernate Search is not
> being run as an extension of Hibernate ORM, that's likely the most
> common one.
> In that scenario I think it would be nice to be able to lookup the
> existing ORM services so that users don't need to repeat for example
> the datasource configuration.
>
> We might also be able to reuse all of the SessionFactory, but I'm not
> sure how to include your model without it potentially interfering with
> the end user's model; I'd say let's start by sharing some services
> from ORM and then see what kind of improvements we can build into ORM
> for this use case; for example this might simplify some of the
> TransactionManager configuration code I'm seeing in your repository.
>
> Of course your existing configuration properties are useful too,
> especially for the non-ORM case as we'll need be able to reuse the ORM
> services.
>
> Also, you might have noticed we are now able to optionally include the
> backend operations in the same transaction. That's not the default, as
> commonly people don't want that, but it would be very interesting to
> evolve this backend to support that option too, you wouldn't even
> require XA when storing the entity in the same database!
> -
http://in.relation.to/2015/07/09/hibernate-search-jms-transaction/
>
Yes, it's very nice feature and fit perfectly with relationaldb
>
> I'd be happy to help with this, feel free to share non-working and/or
> intermediate experimental branches when having questions or just
> stuck.
> Please start by creating a JIRA, you can leave the target version
> undefined: we'll merge it when it's ready.
>
For all the task you have listed can I create sub task to the JIRA, or how
do you track tasks?
>
> Thanks,
> Sanne
>
>
> On 5 August 2015 at 20:05, Flemming Harms <flemming.harms(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Martin
> >
> > For this version the AbstractDatabaseHibernateSearchController is not
> > able
> > to process Lucene workers simultaneously. When we build it our initial
> > requirement was only one node should process the workers at a time, but
> > the
> > “master” was floating. We use Quartz to get this type of functionality
> > and
> > it will synchronizing the execution between the nodes. But you could
> > also
> > use an HA-singleton to dedicate a specific node to process the workers.
> >
> > We had been playing with an idea where we stamp the LuceneDatabaseWork
> > with
> > the known cluster nodes, and then the last node will remove it from the
> > database or a scheduled job can take care of it. The advance of this
> > solution is it will make Infinispan optional, and it can store the
> > indexes
> > on each node instead in a shared cache.
> >
> > Your idea and work look very nice. Pretty awesome feature to support
> > different JPA providers.
> >
> > --
> > cheers
> > Flemming
> >
> >
> > 2015-08-05 11:57 GMT+02:00 Martin Braun <martinbraun123(a)aol.com>:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> Note: I am no core developer of Hibernate Search, but I am currently
> >> working on something
> >> that looks quite similar to what you are doing :). One part of it is an
> >> updating mechanism based on triggers
> >> that uses the database as a event-storage as well. It's not the exact
> >> same
> >> thing, but related.
> >>
> >>
> >>
https://github.com/Hotware/Hibernate-Search-JPA
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The idea is quite nice, but after looking at the sourcecode I am
> >> wondering
> >> how the different nodes are able to work together, because in
> >> AbstractDatabaseHibernateSearchController you remove the entity
> >> from the persistence context and I wasn't able to find code that would
> >> make up for that.
> >>
> >>
> >> Doesn't that mean that the other workers will not be able to read that
> >> entity?
> >> Or will users of this need to implement their own synchronization
> >> mechanism between
> >> the different nodes?
> >>
> >>
> >> Martin Braun
> >> martinbraun123(a)aol.com
> >>
www.github.com/s4ke
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Flemming Harms <flemming.harms(a)gmail.com>
> >> To:
Hibernate.org <hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> >> Sent: Tue, Aug 4, 2015 6:40 pm
> >> Subject: [hibernate-dev] [Hibernate Search] Database back end worker
> >>
> >>
> >> Hey guys
> >>
> >> I want to introduce myself and a new database back-end worker, me
> >> and
> >> another guy have build for hibernate search. I already had some initial
> >> talk
> >> with Sanne regarding if this could be interested to the hibernate
> >> search
> >> project.
> >>
> >> I have been working with Hibernate Search from some time and actually
> >> done
> >> various small custom modification to search since 3.x, especial
> >> around
> >> running in a cluster and indexing. To make a long story short when
> >> we
> >> upgraded Hibernate search we thought it would be ideal to use a SQL
> >> database
> >> as storage for lucene workers for 3 main reasons.
> >>
> >> - The database was shared
> >> between the nodes
> >> - The workers was persistent in case of a node crash.
> >> - No
> >> master/slave
> >>
> >>
> >> *In some way it’s very similar to the JMS back-end worker, where
> >> the user
> >> also have to implement a MDB that process the workers. In our case
> >> they
> >> will have to implement a job using something like quartz or a
> >> timer
> >> service. *
> >>
> >> *We are using JPA as persistence layer for the database, even
> >> it’s a fairly
> >> simple entity we persistent, but it make sense for supporting
> >> various
> >> databases and schema update out of the box. We have tried to make it’s
> >> as
> >> easy as possible to set-up by minimizing the number of properties, and
> >> it’s
> >> all configurable from the persistence.xml*
> >>
> >> *The actually work can* be
> >> *find
> >> here
> >>
https://github.com/umbrew/org.umbrew.hibernate.database.worker.backend
> >>
> >>
<
https://github.com/umbrew/org.umbrew.hibernate.database.worker.backend>*
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *So
> >> based on this introduction and the code, is this something you could
> >> use? (of
> >> course with the modification it requires to follow the design,
> >> style, docs etc
> >> for the search)*--
> >>
> >> Kind regards
> >> Flemming
> >> Harms
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> hibernate-dev mailing
> >> list
> >> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> hibernate-dev mailing list
> >> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Kind regards / Med Venlig Hilsen
> > Flemming Harms
> >
> > -
> >
> >
https://twitter.com/fnharms
> >
https://dk.linkedin.com/in/fharms
> > _______________________________________________
> > hibernate-dev mailing list
> > hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
--
Kind regards / Med Venlig Hilsen
Flemming Harms
https://twitter.com/fnharms
https://dk.linkedin.com/in/fharms