I did a pull+rebase. The rebase had conflicts. But I never found a way to
continue the rebase initiated from pull. I thought `git rebase
--continue`was the incantation, but it was not working. So I guess
conceivably there were additional commits still to process which would
explain the missing commits.
Is there a way to revert my forced push and I can try again?
On Jun 1, 2011 4:46 AM, "Steve Ebersole" <steve(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
I did pull. I pulled immediately before the push
On Jun 1, 2011 4:28 AM, "Strong Liu" <stliu(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> i guess before you force push, you didn't pull
> so, the commits after your last pull just losted after you force push
>
> -----------
> Strong Liu <stliu(a)hibernate.org>
>
http://hibernate.org
>
http://github.com/stliu
>
> On Jun 1, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>
>> I did the force, but to be honest I am still not understanding why this
was
>> a problem. Perhaps I am just misunderstanding what a forced push does.
>> On Jun 1, 2011 3:43 AM, "Sanne Grinovero" <sanne(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
>>> 2011/6/1 Hardy Ferentschik <hardy(a)hibernate.org>:
>>>> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:15:54 +0200, Sanne Grinovero
>>>> <sanne.grinovero(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Some time ago I experienced a similar issue with Hibernate
Core's
>>>>> repository,
>>>>> and solved it by renaming my master, checking out a fresh copy and
>>>>> rebasing in my changes from my local copy.
>>>>
>>>> Right. That was the second option. Keep what was on master on GitHub
and
>>>> rebasing the local changes on top of it.
>>>> We did it the other way around, because we thought that most people
>>>> would have the state we had locally. So restoring this would create
less
>>>> issues.
>>>>
>>>>> From what I understood, (when it happened before) it seemed that
>>>>> somebody had renamed the master from another branch, but I could
have
>>>>> messed up differently.
>>>>
>>>> Well, I stay away from renaming master :-)
>>>> In the long run I would like us to move Core development to the same
>>>> development
>>>> style we have in Search and Valiator. Everything is done via pull
>> requests.
>>>> Not only would this prevent situation like this one, but it also
>> increases
>>>> code awareness, since you see what is happening across the whole code
>> base.
>>>> Maybe Search and Validator are a little easier to handle, because we
are
>>>> less
>>>> people working on it, but I think this should not stop us to try a
>> similar
>>>> approach on Core.
>>>> Maybe not a good time to start right away with this due to the amount
of
>>>> changes
>>>> atm, but maybe once the code settles a little more ...
>>>
>>> It's working pretty well on Infinispan, same model as Search but with
>>> a fairly larger team. Sometimes when there's less people involved pull
>>> requests tend to stack up a bit and we need to ping each other for
>>> who's going to volunteer to take X but we never lack volunteers.
>>> I don't think you need it, especially when you need all possible speed
>>> and are releasing alpha versions of a new mayor version.
>>>
>>> Sanne
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --Hardy
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>