On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:43 PM Christian Beikov <christian.beikov(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
That's a possibility indeed, but there will most likely always be
some
nice function that uses a weird keyword syntax for which there is no
first class support.
And not only that but some databases allow extensions to the SQL spec as to
what can be extracted. So using an enum is nice, but limiting
So even if we propose this, IMO we should still also propose to add
a
note to the function invocation syntax section, that a function may
resolve to a JPA vendor defined funciton as well. This would be like a
"last resort" to use a function at least in a "standard way". If the
JPA
vendor doesn't define the desired function, it's up to the user to
making use of JPA vendor specific APIs for registering the function.
I'm not sure what this means