Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM 3 JIRA tickets
Nice. I think the approach makes sense in our current situation, and I also like that we
clearly explain
what we are trying to do and why.
Good stuff.
—Hardy
On 1 Jan 2014, at 20:04, Brett Meyer <brmeyer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
All, here's the write up. Comments appreciated!
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/HibernateORMJIRAPoliciesAndCleanUpTactics
Brett Meyer
Red Hat, Hibernate ORM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Ebersole" <steve(a)hibernate.org>
To: "Brett Meyer" <brmeyer(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Hardy Ferentschik" <hardy(a)hibernate.org>, "Hibernate"
<hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 4:01:38 PM
Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM 3 JIRA tickets
Probably not a bad idea to write up a blog describing what we are doing and
why. We could link to that in the Jira comment
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Brett Meyer <brmeyer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> I guess you would still include some features/improvements issues
>
> I'm sure some legitimate things may get caught up in this, but I'd rather
> try to clean things up aggressively, then re-open on a case-by-case basis.
> If there's something we close that the community feels strongly about, the
> hope is that they'll comment on it and bring it to our attention.
>
> Brett Meyer
> Red Hat, Hibernate ORM
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hardy Ferentschik" <hardy(a)hibernate.org>
> To: "Brett Meyer" <brmeyer(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Hibernate" <hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 3:40:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM 3 JIRA tickets
>
>
> On 31 Jan 2014, at 21:09, Brett Meyer <brmeyer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Recently, we've been trying to clean up ORM's JIRA tickets. There are a
> lot of duplication, stale issues, etc. One thought was pushing all ORM 3
> tickets to the "Awaiting Test Case" state and requesting a reproducer on
> ORM 4 or 5. They would then fall under our policy of automatically
> rejecting those tickets that did not receive a test case within 3 months or
> so.
>
> Sounds like a fair attempt to try to get a grip on all these open issues.
>
>> This obviously would not include new features/improvements, anything
> assigned to someone, etc.
>
> I guess you would still include some features/improvements issues, since
> Bug is the default issue type and some people don't change the type
> even so they describe a feature/improvement. But that might not be
> important.
>
> --Hardy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>