I definitely want it run regularly (i.e. not "just before a release"). I'd
be ok with it being nightly. That's why I asked in the first place.
Everyone who responded +1'd to it being on-each-push. I really don't
care. I tend to agree it should be nightly, but I only get one vote :)
So the one bad thing about it not being per-push is that we may notify more
than just the person that pushed the breakage.
For now I went ahead and made it nightly (I think, see below) so that we
can see how that works.
To "make it nightly" I enabled 2 triggers:
1) after push
2) each night
Is that inclusive or exclusive? Really what I'd like to say is "run it
nightly, but only if a change has been pushed" (no need to run `check`
twice against the same inputs). So will those triggers do that?
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:11 AM Gail Badner <gbadner(a)redhat.com> wrote:
If check is so compute intensive, does it really have to be done on
each
commit? When I've seen failures, it has been easy to figure out what is
wrong. Can the check job be done nightly, or on demand (e.g., before a
release)?
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
>
http://ci.hibernate.org/job/hibernate-orm-master-h2-main/
>
http://ci.hibernate.org/job/hibernate-orm-master-h2-check/
>
> Initial attempt
>
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 12:58 PM Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On 18 June 2016 at 18:50, Chris Cranford <crancran(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I think (1) and (2) on each push still makes sense with (3) being
> > nightly.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > -- Sanne
> >
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > > On 06/18/2016 11:33 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> > >> We have been having a lot of timeouts on the ORM CI builds. Mainly
> > this is
> > >> due to ancillary tasks. Currently the ORM jobs execute:
> > >>
> > >> 1. clean
> > >> 2. test
> > >> 3. check
> > >> 4. :documentation:aggregateJavadocs
> > >> 5. publish
> > >>
> > >> A huge chunk of the time is taken up in (3) which performs (a)
> > checkstyle
> > >> and (b) findbugs. Also, I am not sure of the benefit of building
> > >> aggregated javadocs for each and every CI build. So I propose we
> break
> > >> these up as follows:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 1. A check job
> > >> 2. A clean/test/publish job
> > >> 3. (?) aggregated javadocs job (?)
> > >>
> > >> This would allow us to split the cost of the Job timeout across the
> > jobs.
> > >> In fact we might even consider making some of these into nightly
> job(s).
> > >> Initially in setting up this server we decided to just have singular,
> > >> all-encompassing jobs because moving to a new dedicated set of
> hardware
> > >> (dedicated to Hibernate team) was supposed to free us from jobs
> fighting
> > >> for resources. But as our jobs have grown on the dedicated hardware
> we
> > are
> > >> seeing some of the same. For certain we want a clean/test/publish
> job
> > that
> > >> is run on every push. To me the others are more flexible in terms of
> > >> scheduling. We could have a separate check job that is run on each
> > push,
> > >> or it could be a nightly job. We might even decide to leave off
> > building
> > >> aggregated javadocs as an automated job/task, or we might decide to
> > make it
> > >> a nightly job as well (maybe even with full documentation builds).
> > >>
> > >> WDYT?
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> hibernate-dev mailing list
> > >> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > hibernate-dev mailing list
> > > hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > hibernate-dev mailing list
> > hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>