Hi Steve,
and thanks for your reply. I guess I have mis-understood what the real
proposal was. Also, unfortunately I don't have enough knowledge of
hibernate's internals and like you already mentioned this change will
actually affect a lot of the code. My question was more to see what the
hibernate team thinks about such a proposal, and if there was something
totally against it. Now I know that it is a valid proposal and might be
included one day in the pipeline.
That's ok for me :)
2015-11-13 14:37 GMT+02:00 Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org>:
Well I like this idea (additional flag on @Filter) better the actual
request (multi-valued config setting). And what about for the
@FilterDef(inition)?
One concern I have is, e.g., getting a collection with a filter enabled,
now disabling a filter and then initializing the collection. That seems
like the outcome (the initialization will not be filtered) will not be what
was probably intended. Filters were designed to be disabled by default and
only enable-able; so a change like this will challenge assumptions
throughout the code.
Is this something you are volunteering to work on?
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:25 AM Petar Tahchiev <paranoiabla(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here's a 6-year old issue:
>
>
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-3815
>
> That suggests to add another attribute on the @Filter annotation
> (something
> like activeByDefault=true). Can we have your oppinion on it?
> --
> Regards, Petar!
> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
> ---
> Public PGP Key at:
>
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x19658550C3110611
> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF 55A5 1965 8550 C311 0611
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
--
Regards, Petar!
Karlovo, Bulgaria.
---
Public PGP Key at:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x19658550C3110611
Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF 55A5 1965 8550 C311 0611