On 19 Apr 2013, at 05:07, Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)infinispan.org> wrote:
Why not. Only doubt I'd have is that other usages of the CHM are
- I guess - services registry and similar configuration tools, for which write performance
is irrelevant: your test measured puts, are there drawbacks on gets or memory usage?
See the original announcement on concurrency-interest by Doug Lea, and the
subsequent comments. The design is up here too. One of the goals was to drastically
reduce memory usage with CHMv8.
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jsr.166-concurrency/8140
Interestingly, Netty uses a backported CHMv8 as well - apparently inspired by our
inclusion of it in Infinispan. ;)
https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/1052
-M
--
Manik Surtani
manik(a)jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani
Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid
http://red.ht/data-grid