+1 makes sense to me. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tristan Tarrant" <ttarrant(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Sent: Friday, 29 July, 2016 9:59:48 AM Subject: [infinispan-dev] Passivation and manual eviction Hi all, Radoslav just brought to my attention that our eviction configuration validator prints out a warning when passivation is enabled without configuring eviction. This was done to make sure users are aware of the fact that a cache with this configuration will never actually passivate. In WildFly's case however, eviction is performed manually (by invoking cache.evict()). In this case the warning is just misleading. My proposal is therefore to introduce a new eviction strategy "MANUAL" wihch internally would be handled in the same way as "NONE" but which would prevent the warning. Wdyt ? Tristan -- Tristan Tarrant Infinispan Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev