Moving Java Forward Faster
by Rory O'Donnell
Hi Galder,
Oracle is proposing a rapid release model for Java SE going-forward.
The high points are highlighted below, details of the changes can be
found on Mark Reinhold’s blog [1] , OpenJDK discussion email list [2].
Under the proposed release model, after JDK 9, we will adopt a strict,
time-based model with a new major release every six months, update
releases every quarter, and a long-term support release every three years.
The new JDK Project will run a bit differently than the past "JDK $N"
Projects:
- The main development line will always be open but fixes, enhancements,
and features will be merged only when they're nearly finished. The main
line will be Feature Complete [3] at all times.
- We'll continue to use the JEP Process [4] for new features and other
significant changes. The bar to target a JEP to a specific release will,
however, be higher since the work must be Feature Complete in order to
go in. Owners of large or risky features will be strongly encouraged to
split such features up into smaller and safer parts, to integrate
earlier in the release cycle, and to publish separate lines of
early-access builds prior to integration.
The JDK Updates Project will run in much the same way as the past "JDK
$N" Updates Projects, though update releases will be strictly limited to
fixes of security issues, regressions, and bugs in newer features.
Related to this proposal, we intend to make a few changes in what we do:
- Starting with JDK 9 we'll ship OpenJDK builds under the GPL [5], to
make it easier for developers to deploy Java applications to cloud
environments. We'll initially publish OpenJDK builds for Linux/x64,
followed later by builds for macOS/x64 and Windows/x64.
- We'll continue to ship proprietary "Oracle JDK" builds, which include
"commercial features" [6] such as Java Flight Recorder and Mission
Control [7], under a click-through binary-code license [8]. Oracle will
continue to offer paid support for these builds.
- After JDK 9 we'll open-source the commercial features in order to make
the OpenJDK builds more attractive to developers and to reduce the
differences between those builds and the Oracle JDK. This will take some
time, but the ultimate goal is to make OpenJDK and Oracle JDK builds
completely interchangeable.
- Finally, for the long term we'll work with other OpenJDK contributors
to establish an open build-and-test infrastructure. This will make it
easier to publish early-access builds for features in development, and
eventually make it possible for the OpenJDK Community itself to publish
authoritative builds of the JDK.
Questions , comments, feedback to OpenJDK discuss mailing list [2]
Rgds,Rory
[1]https://mreinhold.org/blog/forward-faster
[2]http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2017-September/004281.html
[3]http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/milestones#Feature_Complete
[4]http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/0
[5]http://openjdk.java.net/legal/gplv2+ce.html
[6]http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/terms/products/index.html
[7]http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javaseproducts/mission-control/i...
[8]http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/terms/license/index.html
9 years, 1 month
Smoke test suite for hibernate-cache
by Martin Gencur
Hi all,
I'm currently in the process of refreshing the "smoke" test suite for
Infinispan.
There's a relatively new module called hibernate-cache. Could someone
suggest tests that should be part of the smoke test suite?
Ideally just a few tens of test cases (maybe a few hundreds at most but
the test suite execution should finish in a few seconds).
A list of test classes as a reply to this email would be ideal:)
Thanks,
Martin
9 years, 1 month
