Yes, exactly. Sorry if I didn't make it clear enough...
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 4:31 PM Alan Field <afield(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hey Sebastian,
I completely agree that hosting [1] in the /rest context is superior to
[2]. I think that is what you are proposing, right? :-)
Thanks,
Alan
------------------------------
*From: *"Sebastian Laskawiec" <slaskawi(a)redhat.com>
*To: *"infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
*Sent: *Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:10:40 AM
*Subject: *[infinispan-dev] REST content directory
Hey,
A while ago I noticed that we have static directory with some information
about REST interface in the feature pack [1]. The directory is put in the
server distribution ($ISPN_HOME/rest).
Our REST server doesn't host those files when accessing /rest context. We
host [2] in this scenario. Those two web pages differ from each other and I
must admit, that [1] is much better.
I would like to propose removing [1] from the feature pack and serving it
in the /rest context. Would you agree?
Thanks,
Sebastian
[1]
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/tree/master/server/integration/f...
[2]
https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/tree/master/server/rest/src/main...
--
SEBASTIAN ŁASKAWIEC
INFINISPAN DEVELOPER
Red Hat EMEA <
https://www.redhat.com/>
<
https://red.ht/sig>
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev