Fair point... ok, let's leave it as it is now.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Galder Zamarreño <galder(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Dan Berindei <dan.berindei(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> CacheLoaderInterceptor and DistributionInterceptor both honour the
IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES flag for get commands, but I think it would be more
useful if they ignored it - just like they ignore it for conditional
commands.
>
> That would make it possible for users to only keep a reference to a
cache.getAdvancedCache().withFlags(IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES) and use it for
both read and write operations.
>
> What do you think?
If I was to take the role of a colleague of the person who's written the
Infinispan code, it'd be very confused to see a cache reference created
with IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES being used for a get() operation… I can see
myself thinking: "Why on earth do you call get with IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES?"
>
> Cheers
> Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Galder Zamarreño
galder(a)redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz
Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io
Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev