----- Original Message -----
| From: "Sanne Grinovero" <sanne(a)infinispan.org>
| To: "infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
| Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 3:21:36 PM
| Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Cachestores performance
|
| On 4 July 2013 13:56, Manik Surtani <msurtani(a)redhat.com> wrote:
| > Interesting and convoluted thread. I'll try and summarise my thoughts on
| > one email:
| >
| > * I agree with Sanne that a cheat sheet will be extremely useful. Sanne,
| > feel like kicking this off with your use case as described here, on the
| > wiki? I like your ideas but just ranting about them won't help anybody.
| > ;) Maybe then others can follow your template for more use cases, such as
| > the one Erik has detailed.
|
| +1 and sorry for the rant. But still even after all my whining nobody
| explained why we want to prioritise synchronous cachestore :-)
| My point is not being against doing it, but to identify eagerly what
| else is needed to accomodate such a use case: having the CacheStore
| implementation is not enough to make such a configuration usable.
There may not be any "we want to" - just my own preference (without proper
thought, I admit). But I don't think that it has been *prioritized* beyond the several
tests with sync (and there are results for non-sync as well) and my microbenchmark.
Radim