Re: [infinispan-dev] benchmarking 5.1 vs 5.0

Hi, On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:00, Galder Zamarreño <galder(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Mircea Markus wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Now that all the 5.1 major work is done I plan to run some benchmarks comparing 5.1 with 5.0. It's not only tx stuff I'd like to compare, as some other were made, so here's my plan of action. >> >> Each of the following benchmarks will be run on local, distributed and replicated caches: >> >> 1. non transactional: web session replication[1] >> 2. transactional (both optimistic and pessimistic): web session replication[2] >> 3. transactional (both optimistic and pessimistic): tpcc [3] >> >> The difference between 2 and 3 is the fact that 3 induces some key contention between transactions. >> >> Any other suggestion for benchmarking? > > Could it be interesting to see what the autoCommit penalty is? i.e. comparing: non-transactional cache vs transactional cache with autoCommit Pure Transactional and autoCommit 'off' does not work in BETA 5. I am compiling a list of changes I made to make it happen. To save you the trouble of going through what I did and give you a solution that 'works'.