Is there any reason to use synchronization other than "it's faster"?
IMO, the reasoning for removing synchronizations is the same as item 1 in
your proposal, "Async options for commit/rollback".
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Mircea Markus <mmarkus(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Nov 19, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Dan Berindei <dan.berindei(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe synchronization support is another thing that we should scrap in
7.0, then?
I'd still allow them (sync enlistment is there for a resaon), but have
XA+recovery enabled by default and the batching commit should fail if the
tx hasn't completed successfully.
>
> BTW, I've also seen the transaction timeout that Radim mentioned, but
only recently. I wonder if we could do anything to increase it for the
stress tests.
>
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (
www.infinispan.org)
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev