This would only affect the Cache internals (use two DataContainers instead
of one). Users still won't have direct access to the L1 cache.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:24 PM, cotton-ben
<ben.cotton(a)alumni.rutgers.edu>wrote:
Instinctively, this is a very attractive idea.
Would the L1 data container be a "separate, but equal" container? i.e.
would it be a separate instance from the DIST_SYNC cache but the exact
same
data structure?
or
Would the L1 data container be "separate, and different" container? i.e.
would it be a completely different data structure (and API) from the
DIST_SYNC cache?
--
View this message in context:
http://infinispan-developer-list.980875.n3.nabble.com/infinispan-dev-L1-D...
Sent from the Infinispan Developer List mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev