Hi all,
Re:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8552
Re:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8408
Just fell of my chair with ^
Did I somehow miss a discussion on ISPN-8408? Anything that changes infinispan-bom needs
to be discussed in this list :|
Can someone ellaborate what problem ISPN-8408 is trying to fix in infinispan-bom exactly?
I have personally not heard anyone complaining about it.
From my POV, the easiest way to consume Infinispan is leaving the
infinispan-bom as it was. So, the vert.x way.
If we want a different "bom" that doesn't contain Infinispan modules, maybe
we can add it separately and don't break existing examples/apps... but it really needs
solves a problem :|
Cheers,
--
Galder Zamarreño
Infinispan, Red Hat