Hey Sebastian, I completely agree that hosting [1] in the /rest context is superior to [2]. I think that is what you are proposing, right? :-) Thanks, Alan ------------------------------ *From: *"Sebastian Laskawiec" <slaskawi(a)redhat.com&gt; *To: *"infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; *Sent: *Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:10:40 AM *Subject: *[infinispan-dev] REST content directory Hey, A while ago I noticed that we have static directory with some information about REST interface in the feature pack [1]. The directory is put in the server distribution ($ISPN_HOME/rest). Our REST server doesn't host those files when accessing /rest context. We host [2] in this scenario. Those two web pages differ from each other and I must admit, that [1] is much better. I would like to propose removing [1] from the feature pack and serving it in the /rest context. Would you agree? Thanks, Sebastian [1] https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/tree/master/server/integration/f... [2] https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/tree/master/server/rest/src/main... -- SEBASTIAN ŁASKAWIEC INFINISPAN DEVELOPER Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev