Hi Jaikiran, when can we progress on this one? :)
-- E
On Aug 28, 2012, at 8:29 AM, Jaikiran Pai <jpai(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Monday 27 August 2012 08:15 PM, Jason Greene wrote:
>
> The client side should either require a separate, independent, ejb client library or
a plugin library that works with the existing one. I will defer that architectural choice
to Jaikiran. Note that because of the long term route being different, we should ensure
that the code is not too tied to this particular approach.
I prefer having a plugin that can just provide an implementation of a
EJBReceiver which communicates via HTTP. The current EJB client library
should have enough support to just plug this implementation without
having to change the core implementation to support this. Of course,
there might be a few things which we might not have thought of but we
can take that on a case by case basis.
Once I clear off my email pile up, to sort out any priority tasks, I'll
join IRC to discuss more on this.
-Jaikiran
>
>
> On Aug 27, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Eduardo Martins<emartins(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone, I'm about to (finally) start working on EJB over HTTP, which
seems to be an essential feature that we had in previous AS versions.
>>
>> I don't know much yet about the previous design and implementation, but here
is a doc wrt AS5 that explains it:
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/EJB3OverHTTPHTTPSInJBossAS-5
>>
>> The JIRA issue for this development is
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4714 ,
which contains already some ideas for the implementation.
>>
>> So, first question, anyone knows if the old design and/or implementation was good
enough to be migrated? Or perhaps someone knows if it had any issues?
>>
>> In a IRC chat and in the JIRA issue, websockets and xnio were mentioned as
possible foundations for the AS7 implementation, which would mean to discard previous code
already at low level. What is the reasoning for this, i.e., what advantages does the
adaption of either of these bring to the feature and to AS7 as a whole?
>>
>> Your contribution on this feature discussion is very welcome, thanks ;-)
>>
>> -- E
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
_______________________________________________
jboss-as7-dev mailing list
jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev