Hi all, the AS public API javadoc is generated by scripts which follow the logic discussed earlier. In short, these are the rules for inclusion: * All modules NOT marked with <property name="jboss.api" value="private"/> * Their <dependencies> which are NOT marked with <property name="jboss.api" value="private"/> * "unsupported" is treated the same as "private" * All this is merged using union. I.e. if something is marked as private, but exposed as a non-private dependency of a non-private module, it's included. Is the last point ok? It leads to various jars included which would make more sense if not included. See https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-10099 Perhaps a module marked private should override exposed deps? Thanks, Ondra