February 2007 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBCACHE-718) PojoCache TxLockInterceptor needs to release the lock node as well

by Ben Wang (JIRA)

PojoCache TxLockInterceptor needs to release the lock node as well ------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBCACHE-718 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-718 Project: JBoss Cache Issue Type: Task Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: PojoCache Reporter: Ben Wang Assigned To: Ben Wang Priority: Minor Fix For: 2.0.0 Currently, in TxLockInterceptor, I achieve the node lock by applying explicitly a cache.put(). It has two drawbacks: 1) It explicit going to insert a value to that node 2) Needs to do a remove when it is done. Not much can be done re: 1 now, but we should do 2, alhtough it will degrade the performance further. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years, 4 months

3
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBCACHE-754) RPC return values to use a marshaller as well

by Manik Surtani (JIRA)

RPC return values to use a marshaller as well --------------------------------------------- Key: JBCACHE-754 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-754 Project: JBoss Cache Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: 1.4.0, 2.0.0 Reporter: Manik Surtani Assigned To: Manik Surtani Fix For: 2.1.0 Currently, all RPC calls go through the VersionAwareMarshaller which is responsible for efficiently marshalling JBC internal objects as well as user objects using JBoss Serialization. Return values and exceptions, on the other hand, are marshalled/unmarshalled using JGroups' Util.{to|from}ByteBuffer() which uses standard object serialization. The problems here are twofold: 1) Relatively inefficient (in speed as well as byte array size) marshalling/unmarshalling for return values 2) Potential class loader problems Most RPC calls in JBoss Cache do not have return values so this is not a problem that comes up often, but certain features (clustered cache loader, data gravitation in buddy replication) rely on return values. The solution to this problem is to be able to register a marshaller with the JGroups RPCDispatcher for return values (and exceptions) as well as for the RPC calls themselves. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years, 4 months

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBCACHE-932) Implicit lock ownership check in UnversionedNode

by Manik Surtani (JIRA)

Implicit lock ownership check in UnversionedNode ------------------------------------------------ Key: JBCACHE-932 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-932 Project: JBoss Cache Issue Type: Task Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: 2.0.0.ALPHA2 Reporter: Manik Surtani Assigned To: Manik Surtani Fix For: 2.0.0.BETA2 This will involve read and write DIRECT methods on UnversionedNode to check whether the calling thread has acquired the necessary locks, else throw a lock exception. This will ensure proper concurrent access to the Node, even when not going through the interceptor stack. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years, 4 months

2
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBCACHE-788) Optimistic locking should not REQUIRE transactions!

by Manik Surtani (JIRA)

Optimistic locking should not REQUIRE transactions! --------------------------------------------------- Key: JBCACHE-788 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-788 Project: JBoss Cache Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: 1.4.0, 1.3.0, 2.0.0 Reporter: Manik Surtani Assigned To: Manik Surtani Fix For: 2.1.0 Makes things simpler. TXs are only used so transaction workspaces can be stored in a transaction entry. This workspace can just as easily be stored in ThreadLocal for non-tx calls (that just have the lifespan of a single invocation). This will: 1) Make things a LOT quicker since we don't need 2PC for all calls. 2) Make the TxInterceptor a lot simpler 3) Allow the use of Opt Locking without a TM -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years, 4 months

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-4148) Replace Gjt code used in the ejb 2.x validation phase

by Fernando Nasser (JIRA)

Replace Gjt code used in the ejb 2.x validation phase ----------------------------------------------------- Key: JBAS-4148 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4148 Project: JBoss Application Server Issue Type: Task Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Fernando Nasser Fix For: JBossAS-4.2.1.CR1 The JBossAS thirdpart-build.xml grabs a <componentref name="gjt-jpl-util" version="1.0"/> from repository.jboss.com However, the Gjt project has never released a 1.0 version, only a 0.6 version for the Linffors utils and the jpl_util_0_6 is the only tag in their CVS. So, what is the meaning for version 1.0? The CVS tip? Also, what is marked as gjt-jpl-util also contains gjt-jpl-pattern, and the latest CVS tag for that is: jpl-pattern_0_3_b (0.3 beta perhaps) Besides, there is a warning in the pattern source directory: "Untagged files may be (and probably are) in an unstable state and might not compile. If you want something that works, checkout with tags. You have been warned. :) -- Juha" Here, for the record, is Scott's opinion: Scott M Stark wrote: > This is some ancient code used only in the ejb 2.x validation phase. It > has not been touched in something like 5 years. Either we need to > replace it or pull together some code that makes up a usable release. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years, 4 months

4
20
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBBUILD-324) Build.xml in testsuite directory doesn't support multiple JVM argument

by Sunny Chan (JIRA)

Build.xml in testsuite directory doesn't support multiple JVM argument ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBBUILD-324 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBBUILD-324 Project: JBoss Build System Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Targets and Tasks Affects Versions: Repository Build head, Repsository Build Branch_4_0 Environment: Any Reporter: Sunny Chan Priority: Minor We are using the JBoss unit test as part of our JVM verification testsuite. We wanted to be able to invoke tests with multiple JVM options, but it didn't work. If you set parameters via build.sh -Djunit.vm.options with multiple paramters (e.g. -Djunit.vm.options="-d64 -verbose:gc"), it will fail with unrecongized option error. The problem is that in testsuite/build.xml, the junit.vm.options is passed onto junit ant task via <jvmarg value> tag rather then <jvmarg line> tag. The jvmarg line allows multiple JVM options exist in one line. Once I replace all instance of <jvmarg value="${junit.jvm.options}"/> with <jvmarg line="${junit.jvm.options}"/> then the problem goes away. I can provide a patch for this if you want - but I don't know the rules on patches (whether I need to be cleared for contribution) so let me know if you want that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years, 4 months

4
8
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (EJBTHREE-893) Set hibernate.session_factory_name to an appropriate default if the user don't

by Emmanuel Bernard (JIRA)

Set hibernate.session_factory_name to an appropriate default if the user don't ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: EJBTHREE-893 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-893 Project: EJB 3.0 Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Emmanuel Bernard Fix For: EJB 3.0 RC11 - FD This is useful for clustering http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017398#4017398 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years, 4 months

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (EJBTHREE-861) Dependencies should be registered using a canonical name

by Carlo de Wolf (JIRA)

Dependencies should be registered using a canonical name -------------------------------------------------------- Key: EJBTHREE-861 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-861 Project: EJB 3.0 Issue Type: Feature Request Affects Versions: EJB 3.0 RC9 - Patch 1 Reporter: Carlo de Wolf Priority: Critical Fix For: EJB 3.0 RC10 - FD Tip from Adrian: Why don't you just fix it like the ServiceMetaData does when it doesn't know whether it is dealing with a bean name or ObjectName? String dependency = ... try { ObjectName on = new ObjectName(dependency); dependency = on.getCanonicalName(); } catch (MalformedObjectName ignored) { // Not an object name } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years, 4 months

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (EJBTHREE-811) Create a new set of EJB3 deployers

by Carlo de Wolf (JIRA)

Create a new set of EJB3 deployers ---------------------------------- Key: EJBTHREE-811 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-811 Project: EJB 3.0 Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Carlo de Wolf Priority: Critical The current EJB3 deployers need to be refactored to be more in line with the VDF. This should make it possible to augment metadata from other sources (EAR, Profile etc). - EJB3ParsingDeployer : parses the xml to create metadata - EJB3JBossParsingDeployer: parses the jboss-xml to augment the metadata - EJB3ScanningDeployer: scan annotations to augments the metadata -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years, 4 months

3
11
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (EJBTHREE-840) OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space

by Carlo de Wolf (JIRA)

OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space --------------------------------- Key: EJBTHREE-840 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-840 Project: EJB 3.0 Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: EJB 3.0 RC9 - Patch 1 Environment: AS 4.2 (20070122) Reporter: Carlo de Wolf Priority: Critical Fix For: EJB 3.0 RC10 - FD OutOfMemoryError when running microbench -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

18 years, 4 months

3
15
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira February 2007