[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-7348) Elytron deployment depends on org.jboss.security.negotiation
by Martin Choma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Martin Choma moved JBEAP-6510 to WFLY-7348:
-------------------------------------------
Project: WildFly (was: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform)
Key: WFLY-7348 (was: JBEAP-6510)
Workflow: GIT Pull Request workflow (was: CDW with loose statuses v1)
Component/s: Security
(was: Security)
Affects Version/s: 11.0.0.Alpha1
(was: 7.1.0.DR6)
> Elytron deployment depends on org.jboss.security.negotiation
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-7348
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-7348
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Security
> Affects Versions: 11.0.0.Alpha1
> Reporter: Martin Choma
>
> Based on wildfly documentation deployment which is secured by SPNEGO have to depend on {{org.jboss.security.negotiation}} module
> Such configuration leads to WARN message beeing logged into server log
> {code}
> 08:35:05,388 WARN [org.jboss.as.dependency.private] (MSC service thread 1-8) WFLYSRV0018: Deployment "deployment.secured-webapp.war" is using a private module ("org.jboss.security.negotiation:main") which may be changed or removed in future versions without notice.
> {code}
> [1] https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/WFLY/WildFly+Elytron+Security
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1878) CLI should not rely on values that could conflict with shell operators
by Jean-Francois Denise (JIRA)
Jean-Francois Denise created WFCORE-1878:
--------------------------------------------
Summary: CLI should not rely on values that could conflict with shell operators
Key: WFCORE-1878
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1878
Project: WildFly Core
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: CLI
Reporter: Jean-Francois Denise
If we move to a new CLI implementation that relies on Aesh Command parsing, then we will need to activate Aesh operator parsing to handle the following case: ls -l > output.txt
Today, the deploy command makes use of <ALL> as a well known value to refer to all disabled deployment items. This will conflict with Aesh parser.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2119) Separate JMX objects
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
Bela Ban created JGRP-2119:
------------------------------
Summary: Separate JMX objects
Key: JGRP-2119
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2119
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assignee: Bela Ban
Fix For: 4.0
Provide managed attributes or operations in separate classes, e.g. to be used for stats in TP. These could include num_msgs_sent, num_batches_received etc.
A protocol could implement an interface (e.g. AdditionalStats), which would return a list of objects whose attributes and operations should be exposed together with the protocol.
This would reduce code in TP.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2118) TP: messages tagged with DONT_BUNDLE are not bundled
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
Bela Ban created JGRP-2118:
------------------------------
Summary: TP: messages tagged with DONT_BUNDLE are not bundled
Key: JGRP-2118
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2118
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assignee: Bela Ban
Fix For: 4.0
Since 3.x (3.6?), *all* messages are bundled, even the ones tagged with DONT_BUNDLE.
This is incorrect and a regression from 3.x.
Fix: bundle _all_ messages. The DONT_BUNDLE and OOB flags only come into play at the receiver side where messages tagged with these flags are removed from a batch and delivered individually (in separate threads).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 6 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JGRP-2117) TP: messages to self are not batched
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-2117:
--------------------------------
Hmm, the downside is that, whereas the current impl loops back message directly, using a bundler means that the messages would be marshalled and then unmarshalled.
We should create a MessageBatch for looped-back messages without having to marshal/unmarshal.
> TP: messages to self are not batched
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: JGRP-2117
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-2117
> Project: JGroups
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Reporter: Bela Ban
> Assignee: Bela Ban
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> If A sends 100 multicast messages (or unicast messages to self), the messages to self are not batched but looped back individually, each using a separate thread from the thread pool.
> So in the above case, A will receive its own 100 messages using 100 threads from the pool.
> It would be more efficient to batch the 100 messages into a batch and then loop the batch back, taking up 1 thread instead of 100!
> To do this, looping back has to be done _after_ the bundler, when the bundler is sending the message batch.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.11#64026)
9 years, 6 months