[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3330) DMN Properties panel - Style menu
by Liz Clayton (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Liz Clayton updated DROOLS-3330:
--------------------------------
Description:
Request to combine the three current style related menus (Background details, Font settings, Dimensions) into a single menu.
Rationale:
* As the context of these items is very different from the other properties, it might be beneficial to the user to group them together thereby distinguishing them from the rest.
* The extra menu headers required for these additional menus takes up valuable screen real estate, that could otherwise be used by higher priority properties.
* If the user does want to use the style settings, we're creating additional work to make them both scroll down and open the additional related menus.
was:
Creating this jira to investigate if it would be possible to combine the three current style related menus (Background details, Font settings, Dimensions) into a single menu.
Rationale:
* As the context of these items is very different from the other properties, it might be beneficial to the user to group them together thereby distinguishing them from the rest.
* The extra menu headers required for these additional menus takes up valuable screen real estate, that could otherwise be used by higher priority properties.
* If the user does want to use the style settings, we're creating additional work to make them both scroll down and open the additional related menus.
> DMN Properties panel - Style menu
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-3330
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3330
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: DMN Editor
> Reporter: Liz Clayton
> Assignee: Michael Anstis
> Priority: Optional
> Labels: UX, UXTeam, drools-tools
> Attachments: styles.png
>
>
> Request to combine the three current style related menus (Background details, Font settings, Dimensions) into a single menu.
> Rationale:
> * As the context of these items is very different from the other properties, it might be beneficial to the user to group them together thereby distinguishing them from the rest.
> * The extra menu headers required for these additional menus takes up valuable screen real estate, that could otherwise be used by higher priority properties.
> * If the user does want to use the style settings, we're creating additional work to make them both scroll down and open the additional related menus.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
1 week, 4 days
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JGRP-457) Optimization: make threads return immediately if NAKACK has another active thread for the same sender
by Bela Ban (JIRA)
Optimization: make threads return immediately if NAKACK has another active thread for the same sender
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JGRP-457
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-457
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assigned To: Bela Ban
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.5
In NAKACK, when a thread places a message for sender S into the NakReceiverWindow NRW, it subsequently acquires a lock on NRW (lock by sender) and removes as many messages as possible and passes them up.
If many threads do this at the same time, all threads but one are blocked, and - when finally unblocked - usually return. This causes context switches and possibly cache flushing, so a better way would be to have the threads check whether another thread is already removing messages using a CAS operation *before* acquiring the lock.
The effect should be that no threads will wait on the lock unnecessarily, and thus fewer context switches, and more threads available to the pool.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
1 month, 2 weeks
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-10796) Warning about JSF version 'NONE' is shown in logs
by Jan Kašík (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Jan Kašík updated WFLY-10796:
-----------------------------
Description:
Following warning is shown in log upon server start:
{code}
2018-08-02 16:13:28,487 WARN [org.jboss.as.jsf] (MSC service thread 1-3) WFLYJSF0005: Unknown JSF version 'NONE'. Default version 'main' will be used instead.
{code}
Seems like, that 'NONE' constant from WildFly code is somehow used instead of default 'main' value. Version 'NONE' is not specified anywhere, so this warning should not be present. From my point of view, it seems like I am trying set slot 'NONE' to be the default. But nothing like that is happening.
was:
Following warning is shown in log upon server start:
{code}
2018-08-02 16:13:28,487 WARN [org.jboss.as.jsf] (MSC service thread 1-3) WFLYJSF0005: Unknown JSF version 'NONE'. Default version 'main' will be used instead.
{code}
Seems like, that 'NONE' constant from WildFly code is somehow used instead of default 'main' value. Version 'NONE' is not specified anywhere, so this warning should not be present.
> Warning about JSF version 'NONE' is shown in logs
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-10796
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-10796
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JSF
> Affects Versions: 14.0.0.Beta2
> Reporter: Jan Kašík
> Assignee: Dmitrii Tikhomirov
>
> Following warning is shown in log upon server start:
> {code}
> 2018-08-02 16:13:28,487 WARN [org.jboss.as.jsf] (MSC service thread 1-3) WFLYJSF0005: Unknown JSF version 'NONE'. Default version 'main' will be used instead.
> {code}
> Seems like, that 'NONE' constant from WildFly code is somehow used instead of default 'main' value. Version 'NONE' is not specified anywhere, so this warning should not be present. From my point of view, it seems like I am trying set slot 'NONE' to be the default. But nothing like that is happening.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
2 months, 1 week
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11214) Periodic recovery does not recover XAResource after jvm crash when agroal subsystem is used
by James Perkins (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
James Perkins updated WFLY-11214:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 16.0.0.Beta1
(was: 15.0.0.Final)
> Periodic recovery does not recover XAResource after jvm crash when agroal subsystem is used
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-11214
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11214
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Agroal, Transactions
> Reporter: Ivan Straka
> Assignee: Luis Barreiro
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 16.0.0.Beta1
>
> Attachments: JPACrashRecoveryTestCase_commitHaltSecond_jta_server.log, JPACrashRecoveryTestCase_commitHaltSecond_jts_server.log
>
>
> Scenario:
> Halts server at commit phase ...
> # enlist TestXA resource
> # enlist XA resource
> # prepare TestXA resource
> # prepare XA resource
> # commit Test XA resource
> # JVM crash
> # recovery started
> # commit XA resource
> Periodic recovery does not recover xa resource. It looks like agroal subsystem does not register xa resource to xa recovery module.
> Test outcome:
> {code:java}
> Running org.jboss.as.test.jbossts.crashrec.test.JPACrashRecoveryTestCase
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 109.002 sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.jboss.as.test.jbossts.crashrec.test.JPACrashRecoveryTestCase
> commitHaltSecond(org.jboss.as.test.jbossts.crashrec.test.JPACrashRecoveryTestCase) Time elapsed: 102.976 sec <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: Incorrect data in database after crash recovery. expected:<2> but was:<1>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
> at org.jboss.as.test.jbossts.crashrec.test.JPABaseCrashRecoveryTestCase.checkAfterTestExecution(JPABaseCrashRecoveryTestCase.java:150)
> at org.jboss.as.test.jbossts.crashrec.test.TestBaseCrashRecovery.commitHaltTest(TestBaseCrashRecovery.java:485)
> at org.jboss.as.test.jbossts.crashrec.test.TestBaseCrashRecovery.commitHaltSecond(TestBaseCrashRecovery.java:418)
> at org.jboss.as.test.jbossts.crashrec.test.JPACrashRecoveryTestCase.commitHaltSecond(JPACrashRecoveryTestCase.java:76)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11143) Message sent to JMSReplyTo from old client does not find correct binding
by James Perkins (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
James Perkins updated WFLY-11143:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 16.0.0.Beta1
(was: 15.0.0.Final)
> Message sent to JMSReplyTo from old client does not find correct binding
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-11143
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11143
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JMS
> Affects Versions: 14.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Miroslav Novak
> Assignee: Martyn Taylor
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 16.0.0.Beta1
>
>
> There is regression in backward compatibility of messaging client. JMSReplyTo destination set by older client contains incorrect address which causes that reply message does not have correct binding and such message is lost.
> Impact: Applications will stop work after upgrade to WF14/EAP 7.2.0.CD14.
> Test Scenario:
> * Start EAP 7.2.0.CD14/WF14 server (Artemis 2.x) with deployed InQueue and OutQueue
> * Send message to InQueue from older EAP 7.2.0.CD13/WF13/Artemis 1.5.5 client to InQueue. Message has JMSReplyTo header set to OutQueue. Client got "OutQueue" queue from JNDI lookup from EAP7.2.0.CD14/WF14
> * Deploy MDB to server
> ** MDB consumes message from InQueue and sends new message to destination defined in JMSReplyTo header (so to OutQueue)
> * Receive message from OutQueue
> Result:
> No message is received from OutQueue. There is debug message in server log:
> {code}
> 11:36:09,565 DEBUG [org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.postoffice.impl.PostOfficeImpl] (Thread-25 (ActiveMQ-server-org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ActiveMQServerImpl$5@22848193)) Message CoreMessage[m
> essageID=214,durable=true,userID=c0de8bd0-cba6-11e8-840f-f496342f6705,priority=4, timestamp=Tue Oct 09 11:36:09 CEST 2018,expiration=0, durable=true, address=jms.queue.OutQueue,size=580,properties=TypedPropertie
> s[inMessageId=ID:c0383a39-cba6-11e8-95ad-f496342f6705,__AMQ_CID=c0d9349a-cba6-11e8-840f-f496342f6705,_AMQ_DUPL_ID=90d1e80e-116d-4eef-9513-84c6085549db,_AMQ_ROUTING_TYPE=0]]@1680840457 is not going anywhere as it
> didn't have a binding on address:jms.queue.OutQueue
> {code}
> which indicates that jms.queue.OutQueue address does not have a binding.
> The same happesn if older EAP/WF server (with Artemis 1.5.5x) is used and new EAP 7.2.0.CD14/WF14(Artemis 2.x) client is used.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
7 years