[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-830?page=comments#action_12346181 ]
Brian Stansberry commented on JBCACHE-830:
------------------------------------------
In previous comment about not being sure about solution, I was thinking in terms of a
non-PojoCacheable but serializable object that has a ref to a Collection/Map proxy. If
you place that in the cache, how do you ensure that on the recipient node, the object
relationship to the cached Colleciton/Map is maintained? But actually I don't think
that's a requirement at all -- once you place a non-PojoCacheable object in the cache,
any expectation of maintaining object relationships on other nodes is gone.
So, I think the correct solution is to use writeReplace().
Incorrect serialization of Collection and Map proxies
-----------------------------------------------------
Key: JBCACHE-830
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-830
Project: JBoss Cache
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: PojoCache
Affects Versions: 1.3.0.GA, 1.4.0.GA, 1.2.4SP2, 1.3.0.SP1, 1.3.0.SP2, 1.3.0.SP3,
1.4.0.SP1
Reporter: Brian Stansberry
Assigned To: Ben Wang
The PojoCache Collection and Map proxies implement Serializable but don't do anything
to override default serialization. They have non-transient fields with refs to things
like the cache itself, so serializing one of these is a big problem -- you serialize the
whole cache.
Not sure what the best solution to this is. Perhaps use writeReplace()?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira