Guided rule editor: "from accumulate" should support multiple pattern definitions --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: DROOLS-1918 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-1918 Project: Drools Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Guided Rule Editor, Guided Template Editor Affects Versions: 5.5.0.Final Reporter: Michael Anstis Assignee: Michael Anstis This was reported:- On 27/07/12 03:34, Udaypal Aarkoti wrote: > Michael, > > I was talking to Edson about what's the best way to build a PoC for a customer that I am working with and Edson gave a few suggestions. Those more mostly using DRL but I wanted to convert them into a Rule Template that customer can simply use to fill in values but looks like I hit a limitation here and wanted to check if there any way around it. > > Here is the psuedo code and the rule I am trying to implement > > Class Partner {} > Class Representation{ Partner partner } > Class Training {Representative rep} > > The main problem I am facing is that I cannot seem to have a compound condition using "from accumulate" as show below in guided editor. I am able to use either a "Representative" Object or "Training" object as a condition but NOT both using the guided editor. > > Is that true? Is there a way around it? I don't want to use DSL because there are some key bindings that needs to be passed to the condition (i.e user will enter value in the template that need to be passed down to the DSL, which I believe is not currently supported). > > > rule "Accumulate partner Trainings for RPPOS100" > > when > $p : Partner() > $count : Number() from accumulate( $r : Representative( partner == $p ) and Training( representative == $r, name == "RPPOS100" ), count( 1 ) ) > then > System.out.println("Testing : " + $count); > end