November 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: XMBean and SubscriptionList

by alfred.rsa

Last try... <attribute name="SubscriptionList"> | <subscription-list> | <mbean name="FNB.Commercial.BFLo:service=FileEventListenerService"/> | </subscription-list> | </attribute> View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102808#4102808 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102808

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: XMBean and SubscriptionList

by alfred.rsa

Sorry, this is my xml <subscription-list> </subscription-list> View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102806#4102806 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102806

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: XMBean and SubscriptionList

by dimitris＠jboss.org

Your xmbean descriptor should describe all operations/attribute that appear on your mbean interface, including: | <attribute access="read-write" getMethod="getSubscriptionList" setMethod="setSubscriptionList"> | <description>The subscription list configuration/description> | <name>SubscriptionList</name> | <type>org.w3c.dom.Element</type> | </attribute> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102805#4102805 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102805

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

JBOSS strange behaviour

by Steph

Hi, On a linux box (4Go RAM), on JBoss ** 3.3 ** launch, aopproximatively 50 threads are started. Each one occupy 350 Mo... After half of an hour, 75 threads are launched, and each one are bigger and bigger (seen 700 Mo each...). Please note that at this moment there is zero connection requested (apache shutdown)... $ uname -a Linux [-censored-] 2.4.9-e.57summit #1 SMP Thu Dec 2 20:37:00 EST 2004 i686 unknown In server.xml, minProcessor value is 5, maxProcessor value is 300... here is the connector : <Connector className="org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector" acceptCount="10" address="[-censored-]" bufferSize="2048" compression="off" connectionLinger="-1" connectionTimeout="30000" connectionUploadTimeout="300000" debug="0" disableUploadTimeout="false" enableLookups="false" maxKeepAliveRequests="100" maxProcessors="300" minProcessors="5" port="9000" protocolHandlerClassName="org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler" proxyPort="0" redirectPort="-1" scheme="http" secure="false" serverSocketTimeout="0" tcpNoDelay="true" useURIValidationHack="true"/> Does JBoss 3.3 ignore those parameters ? Do you know why JBoss should have this behaviour ? Thanks for your help !!

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Problems retrieving nested conversation id

by ng.tech

Hello there, I'm using seam CR2 and I'm having problems retrieving the conversation id of a nested conversation. Example: @Begin public void startNormalConv(){ Conversation.instance().getId(); } The above code retrieves the Id of the conversation that was just created. But if I'm trying: @Begin(nested=true) public void startNestedConv(){ Conversation.instance().getId(); } It will give me the Id of the parent conversation of and not the Id of the new nested one. Is this a "normal" behaviour ? Is there any way I can retrieve the Id of the new nested conversation in the current code ? Thanks a lot, Regards View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102801#4102801 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102801

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: seam+gwt problem

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : Can *you* run the GWT example on JBoss 4.2.2.GA? It works fine for me. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102800#4102800 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102800

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Removing GWT 1.3 support in Seam 2.0+?

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

I don't think we need to continue to support GWT 1.3, given the hacks that were involved in doing that. I don't think that there are a huge number of people using the GWT support yet. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102799#4102799 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102799

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JNDI/Naming/Network] - Re: EJB3: cannot be cast

by MarWestermann

Thank you it works.. I tried several times "TigerBean/Remote" but then I got a NameNotFoundException.. my fault.. thanks again Marco View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102797#4102797 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102797

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss jBPM] - Feedback about gravel and jbpm4jsf

by vsevel

Hello, I would like to know if jBPM with gravel and jbpm4jsf has already been deployed in a production environment? Or is it too early? If yes, afterward do you think it was a good choice? Thanks, Val View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102796#4102796 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102796

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Removing GWT 1.3 support in Seam 2.0+?

by shane.bryzak＠jboss.com

Actually, after checking the code it seems I already deprecated GWT 1.3 support. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102795#4102795 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102795

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user November 2007