November 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[Management, JMX/JBoss] - XMBean and SubscriptionList

by alfred.rsa

Hi I have changed my mbeans to xmbeans by having the class extend xmbean. But now my in my *-service.xml the SubscriptionList attribute fails with the following: DeploymentException: No Attribute found with name: SubscriptionList this is my xml <subscription-list> </subscription-list> Is this even the right way to add subscriptions for XMBeans? I would actually like the XMBean to subscribe to "global" jmx events and filter them rather than subscribing to specific MBeans Regards Alfred View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102793#4102793 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102793

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Tools (users)] - Re: urgent.. plz help in XDoclet confiuguration problem

by voyzer

I even can't see item, XDocLet Configurations in my eclipse... refer to below page. http://docs.jboss.com/jbosside/tutorial/build/en/html/ejb.file.generation... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102792#4102792 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102792

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Removing GWT 1.3 support in Seam 2.0+?

by shane.bryzak＠jboss.com

I would love to drop GWT 1.3 support, as it would mean I can get rid of a bunch of nasty reflection code that is necessary to support it. However I think it's a little too soon to get rid of it yet as some of our users may still be using GWT 1.3 (for whatever reasons). Perhaps we should aim at supporting just the latest production version, and deprecating support for the previous version. This way we can deprecate 1.3 support immediately, and remove it when 1.5 is released (which if we're lucky will be backwards compatible with 1.4). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102791#4102791 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102791

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Removing GWT 1.3 support in Seam 2.0+?

by RobJellinghaus

1.5 supports Java 1.5 syntax, which will make it a lot easier to send Seam components over GWT RPC, which has all kinds of interesting uses. (Mainly, being able to avoid a whole crappy DTO layer just because you want to send some simple little @Entities over the wire.) I'd like to see a GWT14Service and a GWT15Service in whatever Seam version ships after GWT 1.5. But that's neither here nor there; the main point is GWT 1.3 should be dropped after Seam 2.0.0, and doing so will clean things up a lot. (I know you guys like to stay one version behind, but c'mon ;-) Cheers! Rob View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102790#4102790 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102790

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: Strange ClassCastException in OptimisticCreateIfNotExist

by spennec

Manik, Great to see that the reason is now clear! :-) If I checkout and build TreeCache from the source, will the result be as stable as the 2.0.0 version that I am using? Or are you in heavy development and there may be parts of the products that are "work in progress"? I certainly would like to use the fix as soon as possible, and I am willing to build from source, but I just want to be sure that the result will be production-stable. anonymous wrote : | Yes, when the remove call is propagated to and executed on the other member. No if you're using invalidation rather than replication though; in the case of invalidation you'd just get eviction callbacks on the remote node. | Ok, so if I want to reload a cached value right after its invalidation, I could remove() the node, and catch the event in both members of the cluster, know which node was removed and reload the corresponding data? Thanks for your help, and keep me informed when the fix is ready :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102789#4102789 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102789

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: EJB3, NVARCHAR2 and Oracle10g

by vijayamaladoss

any suggestions ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102788#4102788 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102788

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Clustering/JBoss] - Re: JBoss Cluster on Multihomed zone

by rajeshchande

Queries: - Any special configuration for zones on Solaris 10? - Specifying bind_addr in cluster-service.xml in a MULTI HOMED machine is MANDATORY? - Everytime it uses ONLY 3.183.158 interface to communicate, why not other interfaces like 10.50.1? - Any special configuration required to bind the JBoss intances on 10.50.1 NIC and make cluster running? The requirement is to make the cluster working on 10.50.1, what is to be done in that case? - Even when the cluster forms with 3.183.158, why the session replication does not work? Thanks & Regards, Rajesh. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102787#4102787 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102787

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Clustering/JBoss] - JBoss Cluster on Multihomed zone

by rajeshchande

Hello, Scenario 1: JBOss: 4.0.3sp1 JDK: 1.5.0_12 Sun OS: SunOS 5.10 Generic_118822-18 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240 SINGLE HOMED I have setup a JBoss cluster between 2 physical separate servers running successfully. Farm deployment works fine. Session replication is fine. In this configuration, by default the bind_addr is 0.0.0.0 (Correct me If I am wrong here.), as I have not specified anythng in cluster-service.xml Multicatsing test is successful: http://www.jgroups.org/javagroupsnew/docs/manual/html/ch02.html#ItDoesntWork Note : Scenario 1 is just to demonstrate that I have successfully implemented a cluster with loadbalancing, failover and session replication. Scenario 2 : JBOss: 4.0.3sp1 JDK: 1.5.0_12 SunOS 5.10 Generic_118833-36 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200 Remarks: "Zones" concept is used MULTI HOMED - 3 interfaces ifconfig -a lo0:3: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 e1000g0:3: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2 inet 3.183.188.111 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 3.183.188.255 e1000g1:3: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3 inet 3.183.158.73 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 3.183.158.255 e1000g2:3: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 4 inet 10.50.1.7 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.50.1.255 I am trying to setup a JBoss cluster between 2 solaris zones and they DO NOT seem to form a cluster, if I specify in cluster-service.xml the bind_addr="10.50.1.7" , the cluster is not formed at all. But If I specify the bind_addr=3.183.158.73 and bind_addr=3.183.158.80, then the cluster is FORMED but the session replication does not work. The zones are in the same vlan and same subnet. Multicatsing test is UNSUCCESSFUL: http://www.jgroups.org/javagroupsnew/docs/manual/html/ch02.html#ItDoesntWork The following is successful on 3.183.158: http://www.jgroups.org/javagroupsnew/docs/manual/html/ch02.html#d0e512 Queries: View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102786#4102786 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102786

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Removing GWT 1.3 support in Seam 2.0+?

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

Why 1.5? Can we just target 1.4? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102785#4102785 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102785

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Decorating Seam response

by amitev

Servlet filter will better fit your case View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4102784#4102784 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4102784

18 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user November 2007