January 2010 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Web Services] New message: "Re: Endpoint not registering"

by Dave Palmer

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Endpoint  not registering": http://community.jboss.org/message/519897#519897 Author : Dave Palmer Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/blinder Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- +Try changing the DTD version of web.xml to 2.5+ as you suggested, i tried changing it to 2.5, and i also tried just nuking out the whole schema designation and just use <web-app> both to no avail (oh isn't that cute, i type in colon-open-parans and this helpful editor changed that to the frown emoticon... and was kind enough to switch back to italics when i broke on to a new line... how helpful) -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519897#519897

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Web Services] New message: "Re: Endpoint not registering"

by Peter Johnson

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Endpoint  not registering": http://community.jboss.org/message/519896#519896 Author : Peter Johnson Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/peterj Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Try changing the DTD version of web.xml to 2.5: <web-app xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-app_2_5.xsd" version="2.5" > -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519896#519896

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Web Services] New message: "Endpoint not registering"

by Dave Palmer

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Endpoint  not registering": http://community.jboss.org/message/519895#519895 Author : Dave Palmer Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/blinder Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- having a bit of a problem getting a web service to work. (using jboss as 5.0.1 ga on mac os x) i have a simple pojo, with the @WebService annotion, and a very simple method annotated with the @WebMethod annotation. my web.xml simply defines a servlet who's class points to my pojo (as per the specification for jax-ws) now, when i go to deploy the war, jboss deploys it, but the endpoint is never rigistered, and i never see the console output that the wsdl is being published. my console simply ends with: 16:16:56,507 INFO TomcatDeployment deploy, ctxPath=/my-war i've been all over google, but my google-fu is failing me here. i can't seem to figure out what would be preventing jboss from identifying this as a web service. my implementation class: import javax.jws.WebMethod;import javax.jws.WebService; @WebServicepublic class TestService { @WebMethod public String echo (String message) { return "I was told to tell you this: " + message; }} my web.xml: i am most likely doing something dumb, and i'm really tired and blah blah, i just can't see it. so, anyone see what i'm missing? -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519895#519895

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: Determine whether current Activity is custom or not"

by M M

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Determine whether current Activity is custom or not": http://community.jboss.org/message/519889#519889 Author : M M Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/gubespam Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hmm, that's definitely not any cleaner than what I had, which is below. {code} ActivityBehaviour act = ((ExecutionImpl) execution).getActivity().getActivityBehaviour(); boolean isCustom = ( act instanceof UserCodeActivityBehaviour ); {code} -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519889#519889

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Tools] New message: "Re: Does the build system still work ?"

by Denis Golovin

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Does the build system still work ?": http://community.jboss.org/message/519888#519888 Author : Denis Golovin Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/dgolovin Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- CR2 nightly build is back and available http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/nightly/latestBuild.html. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519888#519888

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Add event listener through API"

by M M

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Add event listener through API": http://community.jboss.org/message/519887#519887 Author : M M Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/gubespam Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Does anyone know if there is a way to programmatically add an event listener to a process instance? The idea is that an external process could add such a listener when a process instance is started, so that the listener would not have to be specified from within the process definition xml. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519887#519887

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Tools] New message: "Re: Does the build system still work ?"

by Denis Golovin

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Does the build system still work ?": http://community.jboss.org/message/519885#519885 Author : Denis Golovin Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/dgolovin Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Apparently, fix submitted for https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-5033was not tested. I updated xulrunner-linux-gtk-x86_64_1.9.1.2a.jar to have the same version 1.9.1.2a in manifest. I verified it locally and it worked for me. It should work now on hudson and build http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/DevStudio/job/jbosstools-nightly-3... has been started to verify that. Tests are disabled for this build to get results faster. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519885#519885

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "NullPointerException on Assignment-Handler"

by Andre Muniz

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "NullPointerException on Assignment-Handler": http://community.jboss.org/message/519884#519884 Author : Andre Muniz Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/andre.muniz Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi! On the following test process when the execution reaches task3 JBPM 4.3 throws a null pointer exception. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <process description="Test" key="testProcess" name="Test Process" xmlns="http://jbpm.org/4.3/jpdl"> <start g="67,236,48,48" name="start1"> <transition g="-43,-18" name="to fork1" to="fork1"/> </start> <task g="255,144,92,52" name="task1" candidate-groups="firstGroup"> <assignment-handler class="com.test.AutoAssignment"/> <transition g="-41,-18" name="to join1" to="join1"/> </task> <task g="258,334,92,52" name="task2" candidate-groups="secondGroup"> <assignment-handler class="com.test.AutoAssignment"/> <transition g="-41,-18" name="to join1" to="join1"/> </task> <task g="515,228,92,52" name="task3" candidate-groups="thirdGroup"> <assignment-handler class="com.test.AutoAssignment"/> <transition g="-42,-18" name="to end1" to="end1"/> </task> <end g="676,232,48,48" name="end1"/> <fork g="172,236,48,48" name="fork1"> <transition g="-44,-18" name="to task1" to="task1"/> <transition g="-44,-18" name="to task2" to="task2"/> </fork> <join g="385,233,48,48" name="join1"> <transition g="-44,-18" name="to task3" to="task3"/> </join> </process> If I take the assignment-handler out it works, which makes me think that's the problem, but if I put it back in the debugger doesn't even get into the class attached below: package com.test; import java.util.HashMap; import java.util.List; import java.util.Map; import java.util.Set; import org.jbpm.api.Configuration; import org.jbpm.api.ProcessEngine; import org.jbpm.api.TaskService; import org.jbpm.api.model.OpenExecution; import org.jbpm.api.task.Assignable; import org.jbpm.api.task.AssignmentHandler; import org.jbpm.api.task.Participation; import org.jbpm.api.task.Task; public class AutoAssignment implements AssignmentHandler { /** * Auto-claim the task to the default user. * @param assignable assignable object * @param execution execution object * @throws Exception exception */ @Override public void assign(Assignable assignable, OpenExecution execution) throws Exception { // Default users (group --> user mapping) Map < String, String > defaultUsers = new HashMap < String, String >(); defaultUsers.put("firstGroup", "firstUser"); defaultUsers.put("secondGroup", "secondUser"); defaultUsers.put("thirdGroup", "thirdUser"); // Engine and task service ProcessEngine processEngine = new Configuration().buildProcessEngine(); TaskService taskService = processEngine.getTaskService(); // Loads the active activities Set < String > activities = execution.findActiveActivityNames(); // Iterates the activities for (String activity : activities) { // Loads the tasks according to the process instance and activity name List < Task > tasks = taskService.createTaskQuery().activityName(activity).processInstanceId( execution.getProcessInstance().getId()).list(); // Iterates the tasks for (Task task : tasks) { // Compares the task name to the activity name // If the task name matches the activity name, loads the candidate-group and assigns the default user if (task.getName().equals(activity)) { // Loads the tasks candidate groups (in our process we have just one group) List < Participation > groups = taskService.getTaskParticipations(task.getId()); // If the groups collection is not empty, loads the default user and sets in the task if (!groups.isEmpty()) { assignable.setAssignee(defaultUsers.get(groups.get(0).getGroupId())); } } } } } } As another unexpected result from my testing, if I replace task3 by a fork and 2 tasks, both with assignment-handlers, the execution flows normally: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <process description="Test" key="testProcess" name="Test Process" xmlns="http://jbpm.org/4.3/jpdl"> <start g="67,236,48,48" name="start1"> <transition g="-43,-18" name="to fork1" to="fork1"/> </start> <task candidate-groups="firstGroup" g="255,144,92,52" name="task1"> <assignment-handler class="com.test.AutoAssignment"/> <transition g="-41,-18" name="to join1" to="join1"/> </task> <task candidate-groups="secondGroup" g="258,334,92,52" name="task2"> <assignment-handler class="com.test.AutoAssignment"/> <transition g="-41,-18" name="to join1" to="join1"/> </task> <end g="858,229,48,48" name="end1"/> <fork g="172,236,48,48" name="fork1"> <transition g="-44,-18" name="to task1" to="task1"/> <transition g="-44,-18" name="to task2" to="task2"/> </fork> <join g="385,233,48,48" name="join1"> <transition name="to fork2" to="fork2" g="-43,-18"/> </join> <fork name="fork2" g="506,234,48,48"> <transition name="to task3" to="task3" g="-44,-18"/> <transition name="to task4" to="task4" g="-44,-18"/> </fork> <task name="task3" g="593,136,92,52"> <assignment-handler class="com.test.AutoAssignment"/> <transition name="to join2" to="join2" g="-41,-18"/> </task> <task name="task4" g="603,324,92,52"> <assignment-handler class="com.test.AutoAssignment"/> <transition name="to join2" to="join2" g="-41,-18"/> </task> <join name="join2" g="732,232,48,48"> <transition name="to end1" to="end1" g="-42,-18"/> </join> </process> Did anyone ever experienced a similar problem or has any idea of what might be happening? Thanks! -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519884#519884

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: Getting variables for completed tasks"

by Ronald van Kuijk

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Getting variables for completed tasks": http://community.jboss.org/message/519882#519882 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- I have to strongly disagree what you propose. Sure, lots of missing functionality could be implemented separately. Heck, you could even implement your own bpm engine. If 80% of the functionality is there, one would be foolish to implement the other 20% in a separate way. Resulting in all kinds of maintenance issues like cleanup etc... migration in case it is implemented in jBPM eventually or even adding lots of code in lots of places.... yuck... In addition this would result in X people doing the same thing, A waist of time I'd say. And the remark of 'if you can't wait for the issues to be resolved' is a very passive attitude. Why not help out 'fixing' the issue. Everybody happy. Or is everybody afraid to help out? If so I'd be very curious to hear why. The code of jBPM 4 is very cleanly written and in the dev forum we are more then willing to help out. So please either help out, or suggest this to others, but act in a way that is helpful for EVERYBODY Peace... -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519882#519882

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Tools] New message: "Re: Does the build system still work ?"

by Denis Golovin

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Does the build system still work ?": http://community.jboss.org/message/519874#519874 Author : Denis Golovin Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/dgolovin Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Xulrunner x86_64 jar now has a suffix 1.9.1.2a but version inside is still the same. I've updated version inside x-86_64 jar to match suffix. We'll see soon if it helps. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519874#519874

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user January 2010