January 2010 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Tools] New message: "Re: Does the build system still work ?"

by Denis Golovin

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Does the build system still work ?": http://community.jboss.org/message/519868#519868 Author : Denis Golovin Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/dgolovin Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- It seems there are some problems with xulrunner x86_64 version update and Update Site build script cannot find it. Artifact not found: osgi.bundle,org.mozilla.xulrunner.gtk.linux.x86_64,1.9.1.2. Because version is 1.9.1.2a now. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519868#519868

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] New message: "Re: Issue specifying the <jar-file> in persistence.xml in JBOSS 5 on linux system"

by Dragos Bobes

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Issue specifying the <jar-file> in persistence.xml in JBOSS 5 on linux system": http://community.jboss.org/message/519860#519860 Author : Dragos Bobes Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/dbobes Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- > 1) (Preferred approach) Upgrade to JBoss AS 6.0.0.M1 > > OR > > 2) Use the latest EJB3 plugin http://www.jboss.org/ejb3/ejb3plugin.html against JBoss AS 5.1.0.GA. I am not much optimistic that this might fix the issue, but give it a try. None of the above worked. I uploaded the log files for JBOSS 6.0.0.M1. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519860#519860

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] New message: "Long client id's for rich faces components in portlets"

by Martin Schwietzke

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Long client id's for rich faces components in portlets": http://community.jboss.org/message/519855#519855 Author : Martin Schwietzke Email : martin(a)schwietzke.net Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/mschwietzke Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- When using JSF components in Portlets, very long client id's are automatically generated inlcuding the path of the current page. E. g. jbpns_2fdefault_2fKunde_20und_20Kontakte_2fKontaktesnpbj:_viewRoot:cf:forenameSearchterm Is there any possibilty to get them shorter? For example to define a very short id for each page in JBoss Portal? Then the id's could be much shorter and many traffic could be avoid. In my opinion it is horror that each component has got such so long id's in the source code. Regards Martin -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519855#519855

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] New message: "Re: Issue specifying the <jar-file> in persistence.xml in JBOSS 5 on linux system"

by jaikiran pai

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Issue specifying the <jar-file> in persistence.xml in JBOSS 5 on linux system": http://community.jboss.org/message/519846#519846 Author : jaikiran pai Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jaikiran Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Looking at the logs, i see what's happening. Although i don't have an good explanation on why this is happening, that too only on Windows OS. For some reason, the baseDir from where the relative jar is being searched for is being resolved to an incorrect location (it's being resolved to the "deploy" folder instead of "deploy/myapp.ear"). Before looking into this in more detail, can you try either of the following and see if that fixes the issue: 1) (Preferred approach) Upgrade to JBoss AS 6.0.0.M1 OR 2) Use the latest EJB3 plugin http://www.jboss.org/ejb3/ejb3plugin.html against JBoss AS 5.1.0.GA. I am not much optimistic that this might fix the issue, but give it a try. Let us know how it goes (preferably with logs). -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519846#519846

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: Getting variables for completed tasks"

by Tej jbpm

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Getting variables for completed tasks": http://community.jboss.org/message/519845#519845 Author : Tej jbpm Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/tejJBPM Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi there, If you cant wait for the issues to be resolved, I had implemented the same by creating my own table and inserting the variables with the process reference id. You get all the variables using the API before ending a task and insert it into your own history table and requery it . Most of the issues in jbpm can be resolved by just implementing in your own way. Some of the functionalities which are not supported I have implemented it in my own application just be thinking of a workaround.. If you are happy with the basic functionalities of the JBPM for your project - then that is the way you go!! Thanks -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519845#519845

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Cleanup Process Engine"

by Tej jbpm

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Cleanup Process Engine": http://community.jboss.org/message/519842#519842 Author : Tej jbpm Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/tejJBPM Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi All, I have implemented a solution with jbpm successfully. My problem is I get a "GC overhead limit exceeded" at times as my program spends too much time on garbage collection. I think it is the way i am initialising the process engine and the clenaup is not happening properly. I do this in the beginning of each file which runs in my application +processEngine+ += *new*+ +org.jbpm.api.Configuration().setResource("my.jbpm.cfg.xml").buildProcessEngine();+ At the end of each file I do +processEngine.close();+ But is this the correct way to do it? Do I have initialise the engine once and then use it all over the pages? Will processEngine.close() cleanup all the executionService, taskService, RepositoryService which i initalise followed by the process engine initialisation. Please guide me if there are any other better ways to do it. +Thanks in advance+ -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519842#519842

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Datasource Configuration] New message: "Re: Problem with number of database connections (Oracle)"

by Michal Rorat

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Problem with number of database connections (Oracle)": http://community.jboss.org/message/519839#519839 Author : Michal Rorat Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/michal_rorat Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- adrian(a)jboss.org wrote:> > 43-5=38 > > 5 is the number of connections that get created when you first use the datasource, if you specify a min-pool-size of 5. > > Since that number matches the difference in configuration that suggests to me that there were none in the pool before the change. > I just tested the application with one MessageDrivenBean removed and started JBoss created 34 connections. Since I have 5 of them with preety much the same configuration we can assume that they reserve 20 connections - but still - what reserve remaining 18 of them? this is my MDB annotation: @MessageDriven(name = "abcQueueListener", activationConfig = { @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "ProviderAdapterJNDI", propertyValue = "OAQJMSProvider"), @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "UseDLQ", propertyValue = "false"), @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "destinationType", propertyValue = "javax.jms.Queue"), @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "destination", propertyValue = "queue/abc"), @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "acknowledgeMode", propertyValue = "Auto-acknowledge"), @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "Durable", propertyValue = "false"), @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "SessionTransacted", propertyValue = "false"), @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "MessageSelector", propertyValue = "JMSType='abc_BLOB'"), @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "maxSession", propertyValue="3") }) -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519839#519839

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal Development] New message: "Portlet Definition in one WAR portlet-instance in another"

by Michael Helfer

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Portlet Definition in one WAR portlet-instance in another": http://community.jboss.org/message/519833#519833 Author : Michael Helfer Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/mhelfer Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- I am trying to create a generic portlet in my content management project. Anybody that wants to retrieve content from my cms project will then create an instance of that portlet in their individual consumer projects. However, all projects cms/consumers will live on the same server. When I set all this up and login to the admin portal, I see the cms-portlet listed in the portlet-definition tab, however I don't see any of the consumer instances listed in the portlet-instances tab. My question is, without setting up WSRP is there a way to reference a portlet definition contained within a separate war? Thanks in advance -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519833#519833

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: How to search Tasks by Name"

by TV Ramprasadh

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "How to search Tasks by Name": http://community.jboss.org/message/519829#519829 Author : TV Ramprasadh Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/ramprasadhtv Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you very much for the response. Appreciate your help. It has clarified my query. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519829#519829

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] New message: "Re: Issue specifying the <jar-file> in persistence.xml in JBOSS 5 on linux system"

by Dragos Bobes

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Issue specifying the <jar-file> in persistence.xml in JBOSS 5 on linux system": http://community.jboss.org/message/519825#519825 Author : Dragos Bobes Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/dbobes Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- I uploaded the server.log and boot.log when the <jar-file> tag was specified without the ear information. <jar-file>myejbmodule.jar</jar-file> -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/519825#519825

16 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user January 2010