User development,
A new message was posted in the thread "Input for better JBoss Tools update site layout":
http://community.jboss.org/message/522394#522394
Author : Denis Golovin
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/dgolovin
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
> mailto:max.andersen@jboss.com wrote:On the other hand I would like there to be an "easy" option to install everything that should be able to work on Eclipse JEE bundle.
I would propose to provide big feature to install everything like tt is done for Eclipse for JEE Developers. The benefits are:
1. One checkbox to install everything
2. One item to remove everything if you need reinstallation.
Here is an example for Eclipse for JEE DEvelopers
http://community.jboss.org/servlet/JiveServlet/showImage/1880/epp-feature...
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522394#522394
User development,
A new message was posted in the thread "jbpm4.3 - NumberFormatException on validateRepositoryCache":
http://community.jboss.org/message/522393#522393
Author : Santanu Saraswati
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/saraswati.santanu
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
I am not really able to reproduce the problem. I am using Spring, jBPM 4.3.The code there also looks fine.
Can you please put break point and check the set methods of RepositoryCacheImpl, from the startup of the server? You should be able to find who is calling this API to add those keys. Let us know your findings.
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522393#522393
User development,
A new message was posted in the thread "Problem with AOP arond advice in JBoss trunk":
http://community.jboss.org/message/522389#522389
Author : Andrew Dinn
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/adinn
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
jaikiran wrote:>
> Not sure, but maybe related to this https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-1950 (and the related JBPAPP issue). But that issue is fixed in the version that's currently in AS trunk.
Hmm, that looks interesting. I wonder if it is the same EJB bug crawling out of the woodwork or whether it is the processing of the WebService annotation which is causing the BAMethod annotations to go AWOL in the same way as happened for @Remote? Perhaps Carlo or Alessio might know?
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522389#522389
User development,
A new message was posted in the thread "seam generate entities for many-to-many relationships":
http://community.jboss.org/message/522388#522388
Author : Max Andersen
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/max.andersen@jboss.com
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
That is better asked at the seam forums since we are simply using the seam-gen templates here - but I don't believe seam-gen ever supported many-to-many generation fullly.
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522388#522388
User development,
A new message was posted in the thread "JBoss Maven Problem":
http://community.jboss.org/message/522384#522384
Author : Max Andersen
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/max.andersen@jboss.com
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Peter, the web-inf/dev is the directory Seam uses for being able to do hot deployment of seam components.
This should not be used by anyone else so i'm surprised that should cause problems for portal ?
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522384#522384
User development,
A new message was posted in the thread "Input for better JBoss Tools update site layout":
http://community.jboss.org/message/522380#522380
Author : Max Andersen
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/max.andersen@jboss.com
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
btw. the first category is not expanded in the screenshot since it would then not fit in one screen.
And please note that pi4soa and jbpm plugins are not shown here purely because of me being lazy - they are supposed to be shown inside both the All JBoss Tools and SOA Tools category.
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522380#522380
User development,
A new message was posted in the thread "Input for better JBoss Tools update site layout":
http://community.jboss.org/message/522378#522378
Author : Max Andersen
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/max.andersen@jboss.com
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
I'm working on https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-4859 which is about provding a better update site layout than what we have today.
I didn't like our current updatesite because it doesn't show very well how big a feature set we actually we have and many might not realize they don't need to install *everything*.
On the other hand I would like there to be an "easy" option to install everything that should be able to work on Eclipse JEE bundle.
So I took a look at Eclipse Galileo updatesite and saw they got some pretty good names for most things and decided to use where it made sense and then also keep the JBoss Tools category (now renamed to "All JBoss Tools") which is everything except plugins that drags in big dependencies beyond Eclipse JEE.
I would love to hear if this updatesite categorization works for you and if not, what you would prefer instead ?
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/attachment/12331814/jbtupdatesitesugge...
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/522378#522378