[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Paul Robinson commented on JBTM-1494:
-------------------------------------
I don't think "performance" is the right term to use here. I think I really
mean "scalability".
I was thinking about taking an example where a service (backed by a DB) is part of a
distributed transaction. In the ACID case, the throughput would be limited due to the
locking of contended data. In the compensations case, the locking window would be reduced
and (hopefully) the throughput would increase.
This issue fell under the remit of showing the community why they would chose to use
compensating-transactions.
Produce performance figures to show performance improvements of
Compensations over ACID
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBTM-1494
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1494
Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Performance Testing, XTS
Reporter: Paul Robinson
Assignee: Paul Robinson
Fix For: 6.0.0.Final
As part of evangelising compensations, it would be useful to show performance comparisons
for different classes of applications.
Ideally, these results should show that that, for certain classes of applications, the
performance of a compensation-based transaction is a lot better than for an ACID
transaction.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira