[JBoss JIRA] (JBTM-1479) Create a quickstart to show how to use IronJacamar and JBTM inside tomcat
by Gytis Trikleris (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Gytis Trikleris updated JBTM-1479:
----------------------------------
Status: Pull Request Sent (was: Coding In Progress)
> Create a quickstart to show how to use IronJacamar and JBTM inside tomcat
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBTM-1479
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1479
> Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Demonstrator
> Reporter: Tom Jenkinson
> Assignee: Gytis Trikleris
> Fix For: 5.0.0.M4
>
> Attachments: test-ds.xml, transaction.xml
>
> Original Estimate: 3 days
> Time Spent: 1 week, 2 days, 1 hour, 20 minutes
> Remaining Estimate: 0 minutes
>
> See JBTM-809 for the algorithm
> You might want to put the startup in the context listener:
> public class MyServletContextListener implements ServletContextListener {
> public void contextInitialized(ServletContextEvent sce) {
> // Initialize RecoveryManager
> // Initialize TransactionManager
> // Initialize IronJacamar
> }
>
> @Override
> public void contextDestroyed(ServletContextEvent sce) {
> // Clean IronJacamar
> // Clean TransactionManager
> // Clean RecoveryManager
> }
> }
> Quickstart application should connect to the database (say PostgreSQL), dummy XA resource and coordinate the transaction. The PostgreSQL data source needs to be accessed via IronJacamar.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBTM-1664) Create a profile that contains the components needed by EAP6
by Tom Jenkinson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tom Jenkinson resolved JBTM-1664.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Out of Date
Resolved by JBTM-1669 and JBTM-1670
> Create a profile that contains the components needed by EAP6
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBTM-1664
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1664
> Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Build System
> Affects Versions: 4.17.4
> Reporter: Weinan Li
> Assignee: Tom Jenkinson
> Fix For: 4.17.5, 5.0.0.M4
>
>
> Currently EAP6 need these components:
> {code}
> jbossts-arjuna
> jbossts-arjunacore-services
> jbossts-arjunacore
> jbossts-bridge
> jbossts-common
> jbossts-idlj-idl
> jbossts-jacorb-idl
> jbossts-jbossjts-idlj
> jbossts-jbossjts-integration
> jbossts-jbossjts-jacorb
> jbossts-jbosstxbridge
> jbossts-jbossxts
> jbossts-jtax
> jbossts-jts
> jbossts-narayana-jta
> jbossts-orbportability
> jbossts-recovery
> jbossts-restat-api
> jbossts-restat-util
> jbossts-restat-web
> jbossts-txframework
> jbossts-txoj
> jbossts-ws-c11
> jbossts-ws-t11
> jbossts-wsas
> jbossts-wscf11
> jbossts-wstx11
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBTM-1664) Create a profile that contains the components needed by EAP6
by Tom Jenkinson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tom Jenkinson commented on JBTM-1664:
-------------------------------------
To compile those modules:
./build.sh -Didlj-enabled=true
(I have assumed jbossts-arjunacore-services was a typo as there is a separate Jira to disable tanuki stuff)
> Create a profile that contains the components needed by EAP6
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBTM-1664
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1664
> Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Build System
> Affects Versions: 4.17.4
> Reporter: Weinan Li
> Assignee: Tom Jenkinson
> Fix For: 4.17.5, 5.0.0.M4
>
>
> Currently EAP6 need these components:
> {code}
> jbossts-arjuna
> jbossts-arjunacore-services
> jbossts-arjunacore
> jbossts-bridge
> jbossts-common
> jbossts-idlj-idl
> jbossts-jacorb-idl
> jbossts-jbossjts-idlj
> jbossts-jbossjts-integration
> jbossts-jbossjts-jacorb
> jbossts-jbosstxbridge
> jbossts-jbossxts
> jbossts-jtax
> jbossts-jts
> jbossts-narayana-jta
> jbossts-orbportability
> jbossts-recovery
> jbossts-restat-api
> jbossts-restat-util
> jbossts-restat-web
> jbossts-txframework
> jbossts-txoj
> jbossts-ws-c11
> jbossts-ws-t11
> jbossts-wsas
> jbossts-wscf11
> jbossts-wstx11
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBTM-1776) Merge the individual emma code coverage reports
by Tom Jenkinson (JIRA)
Tom Jenkinson created JBTM-1776:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Merge the individual emma code coverage reports
Key: JBTM-1776
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1776
Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
Issue Type: Enhancement
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Build System, Testing
Reporter: Tom Jenkinson
Assignee: Tom Jenkinson
Fix For: 5.0.0.M4
Currently each module will generate its own code coverage report. It would be useful if we can try to work out how to get Emma to either merge the reports or potentially we can see if we can change the location of where emma generates its reports (currently the target folder of each module) to a common location and see if that will will merge the reports automatically.
The benefit of this is that certain modules do not contain complete code coverage unit tests and so we appear to have low coverage in some areas but when taken in context with the rest of the project this coverage would be much higher.
We should also attempt to get the qa/ runs to generate emma coverage data.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (JBTM-1774) STM artifactId name potentially ambiguous?
by Tom Jenkinson (JIRA)
Tom Jenkinson created JBTM-1774:
-----------------------------------
Summary: STM artifactId name potentially ambiguous?
Key: JBTM-1774
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1774
Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
Issue Type: Enhancement
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Build System, STM
Reporter: Tom Jenkinson
Assignee: Mark Little
Priority: Optional
Most modules that a user is expected to build and use (e.g. XTS, ArjunaCore, the JTA/JTS uber jars) use an aggregate nominative part of the group plus a module-centric name to differentiate them.
The problem such that it is, can be seen cleanest in JBTM-1769 (https://github.com/jbosstm/narayana/commit/8ec2ab2375e3efb67489e7702f20c4...). Here the user is suggested to build :core to build STM which is ambiguous in context with the rest of the project in particular ArjunaCore.
Can the artifactId be changed to stm-core? or just stm?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
11 years, 5 months