]
Paul Robinson updated JBTM-914:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.6.1.CP13
4.15.4
5.0.0.M2
Fix WSTF SC007 Interop tests so they can be run on EAP5 and AS7/EAP6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBTM-914
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-914
Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Affects Versions: 4.6.1.CP12, 5.0.0.M1
Reporter: Andrew Dinn
Assignee: Paul Robinson
Fix For: 4.6.1.CP13, 4.15.4, 5.0.0.M2
The WSTF interop test scenario 7 (WS-AT interop) was working on AS5 and the early EAP5
releases running on top of JBossWS-Native. However, it has not worked on more recent
releases, apparently following changes made to accommodate the move to CXF as the default
stack. Later releases fall foul of the presence of SoapAction declarations in the service
WSDL. n.b. these changes appear to be the cause of the failure on EAP5 even though the XTS
code only runs on WS-Native. Since WSTF is our only option for performing real interop
with another vendor we need to get this test to work in, as a minimum, AS6/EAP6 and,
preferably EAP5. This may require negotiating a change in the WSDL to remove the
SoapAction declarations or it mayjst require workign out how to get the WS stack to accept
their presence and still deliver the relevant messages.
Once the WSTF test is sorted out interop testing via the WSTF advertised endpoints shoud
be resumed albeit probably manually. SInce SC007 adds nothgin to our QE coverage that is
not already covered by the WSTX11 tests it is not critical to run this test for QE
purposes. However, once we have a working interop version again it would be prudent to
include an automated run of a local WSTF SC007 client against our own local server
endpoint in normal XTS test runs so that we detect any brittleness introduced by the dev
process as early as possible before we need to test interop via the public WSTF endpoints.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: