[jbossts-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (JBTM-1766) STM test failure with emma: Failed tests: testTransaction(org.jboss.stm.types.AtomicIntegerUnitTest): expected:<1> but was:<0>

STM test failure with emma: Failed tests: testTransaction(org.jboss.stm.types.AtomicIntegerUnitTest): expected:<1> but was:<0> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBTM-1766 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTM-1766 Project: JBoss Transaction Manager Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) Components: STM, Testing Reporter: Tom Jenkinson Assignee: Mark Little Priority: Minor Fix For: 5.0.0.M4 Attachments: org.jboss.stm.types.AtomicIntegerUnitTest-output (emma off).txt, org.jboss.stm.types.AtomicIntegerUnitTest-output (emma on).txt Most tests run OK, just this one: Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.548 sec <<< FAILURE! testTransaction(org.jboss.stm.types.AtomicIntegerUnitTest) Time elapsed: 0.328 sec <<< FAILURE! junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<1> but was:<0> at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:50) at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:287) at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:67) at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:199) at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:205) at org.jboss.stm.types.AtomicIntegerUnitTest.testTransaction(AtomicIntegerUnitTest.java:81) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601) at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:168) at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:134) at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110) at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128) at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113) at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124) at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:243) at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:238) at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:83) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:252) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601) at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75) Could it be caused by emma altering the bytecode (which it has to do)?